New Luxury Makeup Reviews: Westman Atelier Contour, Prada Touch Blush, and Givenchy Highlighter

I’m still trying to catch up on reviewing some of my “older” makeup purchases, but today’s post is focused on some of the newer launches and shade extensions!

Westman Atelier Face Trace Contour Stick in Whiskey and Ganache

Since its launch, I have only ever heard good things about the Westman Atelier powder bronzers, cream contours, and cream blushes. Unfortunately, their shade options were considerably lacking in those days. I could finally try the Beauty Butter Powder Bronzer when they introduced the shade Beau Soleil in Summer 2023; and I loved it! I had also gotten a sample pack that included the cream contour in Truffle and cream blush in Petal. They seemed nice, but I couldn’t get a true sense of the products’ performance because those shades are intended for makeup lovers much lighter than me.

After learning that the brand expanded the Trace Contour range, I only had enough self-control to wait for a sale before finally giving in. Nice cream blushes are a dime a dozen, but I don’t have a cream contour that I can point to as my favorite. So, this was a wish fulfillment type of purchase. After buying Whiskey, I wondered if I might have been better off with the shade Ganache, which is not part of this most recent expansion. It’s just that all the promo images for Ganache made that shade look so rich by comparison, so I assumed it would be too deep for me. It also looked quite red, instead of cool, in some photos and videos. After seeing the brand’s swatches of the full range together, Ganache didn’t seem as dark, though perhaps still a little red. I didn’t plan on buying a second shade until I realized Cult Beauty stocks the mini sizes and they ship to Germany. So, my curiosity got the better of me and that’s how I ended up with another one.

For those curious about the differences in packaging between the full-size and the “petite” is that the full-size has a magnetic closure, gold colored ring around the twist up base, and the brand name etched into the rim of the lid. It’s also weighted (not just from there being more product inside) and it costs €50 for 6 grams of product. The mini is not magnetic and closes with a snap. It’s too small to have words around the rim of the lid, but the “WA” heart logo is inside the cap. There’s still some weightiness to the mini, but it’s not comparatively heavy, and it costs €27 for 2.5 grams.

I don’t mind the fact that Whiskey blends in so much that it is hard to see in photos. The best contours are the ones that create the sculpted effect without being able to tell it’s due to makeup. Unfortunately though, this shade doesn’t create a shadow. I knew this was a neutral color, but I didn’t think about the fact that neutral ones that worked for me in the past were a lot deeper (brontours). So, because this isn’t that much darker than my skin tone, I can just see a brownish-pink color without it having any affect other than adding the tiniest bit of dimension from being a different color than my foundation. It doesn’t create a true shadow, so it doesn’t work like a real contour on me.

I didn’t want to buy Ganache because I didn’t think this formula was that much better than the €30 Fenty Match Stix Matte Skinstick, and I still liked the €38 Uoma Double Contour Stick even more. To me, it’s not that much different from the €34 Anastasia Beverly Hills Smooth Blur Contour Stick either. However, getting a better shade did improve my overall opinion of the product. Ganache still has some red to it, so it can look a little more like a bronzer on me, but the depth level does create a sculpting effect. So, I view it as a brontour.

My holy grail cream contour brush is the one by Patrick Ta, but the Westman Atelier Contour continually looked patchy when I used it (even if I didn’t draw the stick directly on my skin). The same happened when I used the Trace Contour with my Bisyodo S-517, but I was successful in blending it with the Sonia G Mini Base. Finding the right brush for this definitely raised my opinion of the product, but for that price I would expect it to blend beautifully with all of my favorite brushes for cream and liquid products. The sleek black packaging with magnetic closure feels luxurious, but the formula is a little stiffer than I prefer. It doesn’t glide as easily as the Uoma or ABH, even when I warm it up on my skin first before applying it.

I appreciate the longevity and non-dewy nature of the Trace Contour that sets to a dry touch, plus it being fragrance-free, but formulas exist (at least in bronzer ranges) that are creamier while still drying down and setting on their own. My favorite type of cream cheek product is melty like the Rare Beauty Warm Wishes Effortless Bronzer Stick. This is my preference because of my dry skin type, and perhaps people with normal, combination, and oily skin get along well with the Westman Atelier Contour because it’s less emollient and has kaolin clay. Plus, the amount of pigment one gets with a thin layer lends to it being easier than other sticks to build up color without overdoing it.

With these aspects in mind, perhaps it is much harder for others to find contours that suit their skin type or undertone, so this product is worth it to them. As that isn’t a problem for me, I can’t help but feel a little bit of regret in buying the full-size, though I didn’t know the petite size existed until I started shopping through Cult Beauty for the first time.

I may as well mention that I don’t intend to buy the newly launched Westman Atelier Sun Tone Bronzing Crème because the duo best suited to my skin tone is Soleil Parfait 4, which is practically the same depth as Ganache. I don’t believe the slight undertone difference among them, based on swatches by Daps_Makeup, is going to look different enough on my face.

Prada Touch Cream to Powder Blush in B32 Caffee

I continually see this shade name written as “Caffe” in the marketing photos, but it says “Caffee” on the unicarton and blush packaging itself, so that’s how I’ll reference it. Coffee is “caffè” in Italian, so it sounds like that should be the correct spelling, but I believe the name written on the product determines what is correct over what is listed online. I might have thought the names were different depending on which country they are sold in, but the US-websites also say Caffe instead of coffee and the German word for coffee is Kaffee. So, that doesn’t apply either.

This blush is long-lasting, but doesn’t set down to 100% dryness on a moisturized base (for example: a dewy sunscreen, glowy primer, and hydrating foundation). So there is a little bit of transfer. This doesn’t have as much slip as I’m used to in a cream to powder formula. It leans more on the side of being a cream.

When I’ve had a drier base that was powder-set before applying this blush to the cheeks (versus the other cheek being powdered after the blush was applied), I could still feel moisture on my skin which also still had some transfer. Powdering makes the blush finish look matte, but it doesn’t do much else. What stops transfer is the Pat Mcgrath Glass Setting Spray, which also lets me keep the hydrated look.

I heard this can be used on the eyes and lips as well, so I tried those once.
On one eye, I didn’t use a primer and the other eye I used the Lisa Eldridge Liquid Silk. I had creasing on both eyes, but the one without the Lisa Eldridge product was worse. I was able to fix the creasing by powder-setting the better side and that worked. However, it also muted out the color a bit. So, I don’t plan on using this blush on my eyes again.

As a lip product, it looks beautiful. I feel it looked even better than Fwee Pudding Pots, but it’s drier. The time it takes to repair my lips once it dries past a certain point isn’t worth using Caffee this way again.

Although “parfum/fragrance” is not written on the ingredient list, it still contains aroma/flavor, vanillin, and quite a few essential oils and extracts that have scents. It still smells exactly like my Prada lip balm and highlighter, but thankfully nowhere near as potent. I had to bring the blush right up to my nose to detect it.

These are some of my small cheek brushes that fit fairly well in the pan, but can still get some product around the edges.

Please forgive me if you’re tired of hearing or reading complaints about the packaging, but it’s something I cannot overlook. Packaging has always been important to me, to the point where I’ve bought items in the past that I knew were purely for collecting/display purposes. In my post about Weighty Makeup Packaging, I talked about the look and feel of a product contributing to the perception of luxury and what my expectations are if it comes with a high price tag.
In the case of the Prada Blushes, I could tell from photos that the plastic would be light, and that fact alone almost stopped me from buying one. Even though the square silver and gold mirrored refillable compacts aren’t that heavy, they still have a high end look to them. Although I wouldn’t want to pay the same price for the blushes as the brand’s eyeshadow quads and highlighters cost, I would still be willing to spend an extra €20 for a more substantial container than what they chose. The Prada Blushes feel exactly like the material used for my Bluetooth earbuds case!

It was the brand offering a blush in my favorite type of color, combined with the 20% discount from Douglas, that made me give this product a chance. However, I can’t help but be disappointed whenever I hold it (which is ironic because I love my Bluetooth case) because it feels like I’m handling a knockoff instead of an authentic product from Prada. The chunky triangle in that soft color is somewhat cute, and I understand the appeal at being able to snap two or more blushes together in that packaging, but I don’t even get to utilize that feature unless I buy another one. Products should be satisfying to use on their own without the gimmick of being stackable. The discounted price I paid was supposed to make up for the disappointing packaging as long as I loved the actual makeup inside. Because it’s not the type of cream-to-powder that dries down completely, it didn’t fully make up for it.

Givenchy Prisme Libre Highlighter Powder in 004 Coral Copper

This is another wish fullfillment purchase of sorts. The coral portion of this highlighter has the same kind of vibrant vibes as the Haus Labs highlighter in the color Fire Opal, which I ended up returning because that specific shade was way too glittery. This tone of highlighter isn’t that popular compared to the typical pink, champagne, gold, and bronze. I wasn’t even sure if Coral Copper would suit me, but I wanted something different. The only highlighter that comes to mind from my collection that’s anywhere near similar to this one is Dreamsicle by Becca Cosmetics, which is eight years old.

Thanks to A A Luxury Makeup stating that this highligher isn’t as deep as marketing images show, and the discounted price of €37 at Flaconi, I felt there was less risk of dissatisfaction in making this purchase. Plus, it’s a baked product, which is a feature I tend to like in highlighters (or at least I love baked gelee and gel-powder hybrid formulas). The Prisme Libre Highlighter Powder is said to contain micro hyaluronic acid and squalane for hydration and comfort.

One of the first things I look for in a highlighter is incredible smoothness in texture. The tinier the particle size the better. I also prefer highlighters that can be subtle up to medium intensity. This highlighter is an interesting mix of having small particles and looking smooth, but some of the shimmer in the mixture is super reflective and pearly. The base colors partly blend into my skin, so it looks subtle in that way, but the reflect is strong enough to be considered a strobe type of highlight. To quote the brand, “A blend of blurring powders and light-reflecting pearls, helping to visually smooth the skin and provide multidimensional radiance and a long-lasting blurring effect.”
This has indeed been my experience. I like the blur properties, but the reflect is too much for me, so I tend to blend out the highlighter quite a bit or use brushes specifically suited to pick up less product.

Sheerest application vs heavier application on top of a peach colored blush.

A different lighting situation with a normal application vs a normal amount on moisturized skin.

My experience with this highlighter has been very inconsistent because it looks different in various lighting situations. It looks exactly to the smoothness level I like at some angles, but then the shimmer looks obvious at others. If I’m using all my hydrating skincare underneath, the highlighter practically melts into my skin and looks subtle even with a heavy application. If my face is on the drier side, I can see the highlighter take on a little bit of a wet look that’s either textured or smooth depending on how the light hits it in that moment. Essentially, this isn’t a perfect highlighter for me. It’s too reflective to pass as a natural looking glow, however, pairing this with a peachy or coral blush (to match the base color) gives me results that I am the happiest with.

So, this range is best suited for someone who likes a beaming and obvious highlighter without containing actual glitter. Parfum is fairly high on the ingredient list, so that could be a potential issue for someone. It smells like the typical Prada powders mixed with the typical Dior powder scent. I can detect it the entire time the compact is open, and I can also smell it on my face for at least ten minutes before it goes away. It’s not the strongest I’ve ever smelled and it’s not overwhelming, but I never fail to notice it.

In terms of longevity, I’ve had no issues. It’s just the perfume and radiance level that I’m not thrilled about, but I’m so pleased with how it looks paired with certain blushes that I’m still glad I bought this. I must admit though that I’d be unhappy if I paid full price for it. It costs the same as a Prada highlighter refill, which I think is a worthier purchase, minus the Prada one being overly perfumed. I still hate that.

The packaging can seem a bit bulky, since it’s the same size as the Prisme Libre pressed powders and bronzers without including the brush. However, I don’t mind because of the potential to be refillable (the bottom pops out), and the fact that I dropped it on a hard floor and the compact sprung open without the highlighter breaking.

One more thing I wanted to mention is that for some reason, the Douglas website lists the shade I own (H004 Coral Copper) as “H005 VELOURS BRONZÉ.” This makes me wonder if there is a 5th shade coming and they accidentally listed it. However, it could also be purely an error. Shade H002 Rosy Gold is currently listed as Coral Copper instead. At the time that I finished typing this post, the shade names for the new/reformulated Tom Ford Bronzers are still incorrect and I’ve seen incorrect names as well as two products with switched names listed before. So, it could mean nothing, or maybe it was even a planned shade that got scrapped, but how fun if I learned a secret!

Whenever I discovered errors on the Sephora-US website, I used to email customer service and they corrected it within a few days. I’ve attempted to contact Douglas twice in the past and once I never got a response. The other time was regarding the swapped names of the holiday Gucci blushes and they didn’t respond back until three or four weeks later and it took another week for them to attempt to correct it (which still had another error). So, I don’t bother.

Anyway, that concludes this series of reviews! I hope this has been helpful. Thank you for reading!

-Lili

Victoria Beckham Beauty Brand Review

Not pictured above (but will still be reviewed) are two additional Satin Kajals, the Brightening Waterline Pencil, and the Orchid Palette.

I utilized the 20 and 25% off sales Victoria Beckham Beauty had during November and December last year to buy new (to me) products, along with additional shades of things I already love from the brand!
So, let’s get right to the reviews and updates!

The Cell Rejuvenating Illuminator in Golden

This product contains the Augustinus Bader proprietary TFC8® blend of skincare ingredients in the formulation. I bought the smaller 20ml size which retails for €88. A mini sizes of the Augustinus Bader face creams are 15ml for €93. So, I was curious how comparable these two products would be. Unfortunately, since Augustinus Bader doesn’t sell minis of The Light Cream (only The Cream and The Rich Cream), I can’t confirm if The Light Cream has the most similar consistency to the Victoria Beckham Beauty Illuminator. I can only say that AB’s The Cream is thicker, not as lightweight, and feels more moisturizing. I don’t consider it that heavy as a skincare product on bare faced days or to sleep in overnight, but I prefer to wear thinner layers of skincare when I plan to wear makeup.

Although I need a lot of hydration to combat my dry skin, putting heavy products or adding too many layers (that build up to a thick amount of skincare) clogs my pores easily and leads to other problems. So, I always prefer using the most lightweight yet effective hydrating and moisturizing products. At a bare minimum, I try to use a milky toner and sunscreen daily. Depending on which combination I use of those two products, adding a moisturizer on top is already overkill. With this Illuminator from VBB, I tend to be able to use my milky toners and my best absorbing sunscreens together without there being any problems. So, the VBB Illuminator is better at doubling as a moisturizer and primer, coupled with my other skincare products, than AB’s The Cream.

I’ve been using the Illuminator since January, but strictly as a primer under makeup. I haven’t noticed any long-term changes to my skin, but my face feels suppler and hydrated each time I put it on. It makes for a nice smooth canvas to put makeup on and the glow is subtle. It does turn my skin a little more golden-yellow in color, but it’s only strong enough to impact the shade of my foundation if I’m using one that has sheer to light coverage. This actually helped turn one of my Chanel foundations into a better shade match, but it has also made a bad match worse. So, it would be nice to have an option that’s clear or close to it. I have heard that the shade Pearlescent might not be the frosty white color I assumed it would be, so, I might consider trying that one in the future.

This isn’t the only glowy golden product out there. I also own a mini of the Milk Hydro Grip + Glow Primer.

Milk’s primer is thicker. It has less gold pigment, which means it doesn’t alter my foundations as easily. Milk’s glow comes from shimmer particles, whereas VBB’s shine is due to a combination of shimmer and the slightly emollient finish. VBB’s sinks into the skin and is better at hydrating than forming a slight barrier (like Milk’s). Other than hyaluronic acid, there isn’t that much else benefiting the skin in the Milk formula, but it does extend the wear of makeup because it has stronger gripping power. VBB’s is better for those that prioritize skincare because, for example, among the long list of skincare ingredients is four types of hyaluronic acid instead of just one.
There is a big price difference, but part of that is due to the ingredients used as well as the packaging. Milk’s is plastic. VBB’s is super luxurious and heavy with a magnetic closure for the cap. I’ve seen the cap stand askew when I’ve taken it out of my makeup bag, but the magnetic hold is strong enough that it never got knocked off entirely.

I can also think of the Charlotte Tilbury Hollywood Flawless Filter and Dior Forever Glow Star Filter Multi-Use Highlighter as additional products that can be used as glowy primers, but they don’t feel as nice on my skin when they cover my entire face, rather than being used in specific areas as liquid highlighters.

Although I haven’t been able to detect long term changes to my skin, I enjoy the nourishing feel of the Illuminator so much that I will seriously consider repurchasing it (on sale) after I’ve emptied my current container. Even though getting the full size is more cost effective in terms of price per milliliter, VBB is still a “clean” beauty brand. So, I don’t want to risk getting a larger size and not using it up within the 12 month period after opening time frame.
Also, if Augustinus Bader ever releases The Light Cream in a travel size, I could potentially prefer that instead for pricing reasons. I’ve gotten Augustinus Bader skincare for up to 30% off at various retailers, but the maximum discount I’ve been able to get from VBB has been 25% during the holidays. Then again, AB’s product might not be as suitable for me under makeup. So, I will consider these factors and make my decision by the end of 2026.

Satin Kajal Liner (with Sharpener) in Cocoa, Fig, and Olive

It’s very difficult to get me excited about a colorful eyeliner, so it says a lot that I own three of these. Of course, I have heard so many beauty gurus praising the Satin Kajals and even going so far as to say they’re the best on the market. Considering how many good and affordable eyeliners are out there, I rarely feel that high end and luxury eyeliners are worth the price. I still can’t answer that question of worth for others, but I will say these are my current favorite non-liquid and standard colored eyeliners. By “standard colors,” I mean eyeliners that aren’t duochromes or multichromes.

There are matte, shimmer, and jewel liner finishes. Cocoa and Fig are matte, but Olive has a shimmer finish. I did not purchase any jeweled ones because that’s the only type I’ve heard aren’t as well liked by other customers (because the jeweled ones are supposedly gritty feeling).

The consistency of these liners are super creamy in the first few uses, but afterwards they are a more controllable level of creaminess that allows one to glide the product over the skin without tugging and there is enough time to smudge it a bit and smooth it out before it sets down to its budge-resistant and waterproof finish. The evenness of the distribution of color and ease of creating the shaded effect are what puts these above many other eyeliners.

Also, I am mindful to keep the proper cap on each side of the pencil. I came across a video where a brand owner explained that the cap with the extra lining inside the plastic is meant to keep it airtight (I forgot the exact term that was used), whereas the cap that fits over the smudger side does not have this lining. The Kajal could dry out if the caps get swapped for an extended amount of time. Since I hadn’t paid attention to this kind of thing until this year, I wanted to share this reminder for anyone else who might not have known this. In the case of the VB Beauty kajals, the cap for the pencil side has a white inner ring and the smudger side is black.

Besides using these to line the eyes, they also make for great eyeshadow bases to used solo or to intensify the color of whatever powder eyeshadow gets used on top.

Cocoa is a beautiful shade of brown, but it’s too light to add definition/dimension to my lash line. I still use it sometimes as a transition color in deeper dramatic looks.

I love this shade of purple, but it can look patchy when smudged or blended out. It looks best when drawn on, like for eyeliner use, and not touched much afterwards. If I use it as a base color that will be covered up anyway, then patchiness isn’t a big deal.

My only complaint about Olive is that it’s not actually olive in color/tone. This is a blue-based green or deep teal-green. I’d expect this color to be called Peacock or something. It’s still a pretty color, but the name is misleading.

I do find these to be long-lasting and waterproof (yet easy enough to remove with micellar water and a makeup eraser cloth). However, because this formula gives some wiggle room in which to be able to smudge it before it fully sets down, I struggle to use these in my waterline. They drip away or get wiped away long before being able to lock down. So, I don’t bother trying to tightline with these. I’m fine with this being the situation because of how well they perform at other tasks.

These might be the best kajals in the world, but I will always love and prefer a black liquid eyeliner pen. I very seldom have the desire to use a colorful eyeliner, so I am perfectly content with having just a few of these. I still don’t think it’s totally necessary for a casual makeup wearer to spend so much on a Satin Kajal considering how many great eyeliners are available at more affordable prices. However, I can acknowledge these are extremely good.

Instant Brightening Waterline Pencil

Historically, this type of product has always been difficult for me to use because of my easy-to-become-watery eyes. I gave up buying them several years ago and the only reason I decided to get this one is because it’s made specifically for use in the waterline. The Satin Kajals have their own formula and don’t work for me in the waterline, but are amazing for many other purposes, so I thought this product being sold apart from them for this designated task could be the answer I’ve been looking for.

In terms of this “universal” color, I do think it’s a good one. It has the right undertone balance and isn’t too light/white. Unfortunately, my watery eyes do not allow this to work. My waterline is too wet and even if I get the color to stay there, it never fully sets. The tiniest touch hours later still makes it come off instantly. Also, my eyes look too strange if I have a light color on my lower lash line and nothing below it adding definition. So, I usually put a dark eyeliner between and below my lower eyelashes. In doing so, if my pencil isn’t sharp enough to avoid getting some in the brightened liner section, I have the hardest time fixing it. And then the darker color discrepancy looks messy and amateurish.

While I like the creaminess of the pencil for gliding it across the waterline, it taking too long to dry (if at all), makes this just as much of a struggle to create this kind of eye look as all the other liners in my past. The part that is nearest to my eyelashes (basically between my eyelashes) is what stays put and sets down as long as actual tear droplets haven’t fallen and wet the whole area. So, I know this can work. It’s just not that great on me.

Posh Gloss in Poolside and Aperitivo

The Posh Glosses adhere well to the lips, and both hydrate and form a moisturizing barrier. It can last through at least one meal and several drinks before needing to be reapplied. The brand claims (and pretty much all other brands too) that their gloss isn’t sticky, but it is a little. However, it’s a lot less than many other glosses I use. I don’t think it would cling so well to the lips and be as long lasting without having at least some tack to it.

This formula has totally different ingredients from the Pat Mcgrath Lust Glosses, but they remind me of each other in how plush they feel on my lips and how conditioning they are. If I had to nitpick at the tiny differences, I would say that PML’s has a thinner viscosity, more shine, and it has a scent. VBB’s is better at conditioning my lips and the oil content makes it slightly less sticky despite having a thicker overall texture. Less gloss comes out onto VBB’s applicator, so it’s easy to get an almost as thin layer from just applying one swipe on the lips and then rubbing them together.
When it comes to the pigment level, the Lust Glosses range from being equally pigmented, less, or more pigmented than the Posh Glosses.

What I look for most in a gloss is how well it helps combat dryness and how pretty the color looks. I prefer them to be unscented and they don’t need to be high-shine (just have some shine). I essentially view my favorites as liquid lip balms. With all this in mind, the Posh Glosses have surpassed Pat Mcgrath’s formula in my eyes, but I still reach for Pat’s for specific colors. PML has twice as many shade options.
I still easily recommend both products, and they are around the same price at €34 for 4.5ml for PML and €36 for 4ml for VBB. However, Pat Mcgrath usually has a holiday sale where the Lust Glosses are marked down by 50% (or $12), at least in the US. Whether the brand will continue to do that sale during the bankruptcy proceedings is unknown. As for the Posh Glosses, I believe 25% off is the biggest discount the brand offers.

There is no shortage of great glosses out there. I will happily continue to use Poolside (Aperitivo is a brighter pink than I expected), but I haven’t found a shade in the lineup that I’m over the moon about. So, I like this a lot, but it hasn’t breached the “favorites”category. I don’t regret buying one, but given the size of my lippie collection, it should have stayed at just one.

Posh Balm in Cannelle

In the top photo, the balm is on the left half and the right half is bare. In the bottom photo, the balm is spread across the lips entirely.

The lip balm feels great on the lips. I still consider it to be a little sticky, but it’s less so than the lip glosses. These aren’t as long lasting either though and the pigment level is much lower. As far as I know, the shades Colette, Fleur, and Cassis have the pH-adapting ingredients, but Glacé does not. One of the reviewers I watch said Cannelle doesn’t have it either, but Red 27 is listed as one of the ingredients for that shade and after having used this enough times, there is now a little bit of pink around the rim of the packaging. So, I think it’s safe to say this shade is pH-adaptive too. There just isn’t a lot in it.

The amount of shine I get from the balm is good, but the color can cling a bit to the cracks of peeling skin. I have to be careful to really work the product into my lips, a bit more than I’d expect from a low pigment product.

I prefer my lipgloss to be nourishing, but I absolutely expect a balm to have even more lip-caring ingredients. While this balm does satisfy me regarding hydration, the need for me to reapply it more often than the brand’s lip gloss is why I won’t be buying anymore. I cannot gain the benefits if the moisture layer comes off and I don’t notice it until many hours later. At least when most of the Posh Gloss has worn off from eating, I can still feel residue that continues to keep my lips protected. So, if I delay in reapplying, it isn’t as much of an issue.

I will say though that the Posh Balm is more nourishing than a lot of high-end and luxury balms I have used in the past. I have not tried the reformulated Nars Afterglow Lip Balms, but I loved the previous Laguna shade (similar to Cannelle), and yet I rarely wore it because it wasn’t hydrating enough. In fact, I end up not liking the majority of lip balms in stick form, so I still give the brand kudos for the Posh Balm. One product that I like more is the Lisa Eldridge Baume Embrace simply because of the similar amount of nourishment and the extra pigment. Although I have to reapply the Baume Embrace more often, that’s the tradeoff for have significantly less stickiness.
I’m glad I bought one of these, but I don’t need anymore.

The Concealer Pen with TFC8® in MD1. 5

I would ordinarily never spend €56 (the sale price) on a concealer, especially taking into account the minuscule 2.4 ml (0.08 fl oz) of product and how much of it is wasted due to the click delivery system (and what gets stuck in the applicator’s bristles), but I had many reasons to think this would be worth it:

  1. The Augustinus Bader TFC8 blend is in this product. I rarely use eye creams, so this seemed like an easy way to finally get good skincare into this area while also being able to camouflage my dark under eye circles.
  2. Although the brand’s foundation is out of my price range, I still wanted to have a better idea of what my shade could be among the VBB complexion products. This knowledge could benefit me if the brand ever decides to release another foundation or concealer in the future.
  3. I was impressed by this concealer’s performance when I tried it out via the foil sample pack. This provided a lot more coverage than I expected and although I could only test it for six hours, it didn’t budge in that time frame. So, I figured that even if the full wear time didn’t end up going far past six hours, I could at least use this like a daytime eye cream on no-makeup days or potentially even like an under-eye primer if it played nice with other concealers.

Unfortunately, the consistency of the samples are not the same as what customers get from the actual product. The sample is thicker and less fluid. I can only assume that’s due to being old and/or it managed to gradually dry over time within the foil. That sounds like it would be a bad thing, but the sample adhered to my skin way better! How the sampler looked right after being opened can be seen HERE, but also the photo below shows the difference in viscosity and even how it looks over the lines of skin vs the concealer pen. This isn’t a one-time incident either. The photos I took below were from a second sample pack that I got from my most recent order.

It makes sense that the concealer needs to be very fluid, given the type of dispenser the brand chose. The reason this matters is because products this creamy and emollient do not stick around on me. I had a similar problem with the Chanel Ultra Le Teint Correcteur Concealer. No matter what methods I use, I cannot prevent it from being absorbed by my skin and/or fading. It starts early and just continues gradually disappearing within 2-6 hours depending on how unlucky I am.

When I put the sample and actual product side-by-side, as shown in the photo below, I can see that the right half looks more emollient and continues to look wetter after being set with powder. Also, the act of patting in powder with a brush manages to lift some of the concealer back off.

It doesn’t help that when my eyes get watery, any falling droplets makes it disappear too.

I used a lot of product under my eyes while taking these blog photos, but that is not the cause of the problems. When I use less product under my eyes, it just disappears faster. I’ve tried different powders with it, my MILK under eye primer, leaving the product to sit for a while before setting it, etc. Not only does it not fade gracefully, it also creases. So, even if I wanted to just use it as an eye cream, it looks terrible after 3-4 hours. Mixing it with other concealers or using a tiny amount underneath them doesn’t help either because the VBB concealer breaks the others down. So, this product was an absolute fail for me. It’s incredibly disappointing to buy a product, expecting it to work as wonderfully as the sample, but then it doesn’t.

I decided to post swatches of how MD1.5 compares to the others, since my shade isn’t available in the free sample pack. Although DK1 is neutral, I think it actually might have been the better choice for me than MD1.5, but it doesn’t matter at the end of the day if the fading issue can’t be resolved.

The thought has crossed my mind to try and transfer the concealer from the pen into a tiny jar (in the hopes it can dry and solidify a little without drying out completely). However, doing that could lessen the efficacy of the skincare ingredients.

Matte Bronzing Brick in 4 (Warm: Amber / Contour: Sunset)

I bought my first Bronzing Brick three years ago and posted a review showcasing Shade 5. Since the moment I first tried this product, it has always ranked among my top 5 favorite bronzers, but I didn’t use it as often because I always needed to mix the two shades. The right half had too strong of a red undertone for my preference, so I would combine it with the left half to try and balance out the color and tone down how dark it was.

I finally decided to give Shade 4 a try, and I’m so glad I did! The darker half has more of a golden-orange undertone that I can use by itself. I still use the lighter half of the pan to either diffuse the edges or lighten the overall color. Essentially, the main difference between the two Bronzing Brick colors is that Shade 4 makes it way easier for me to create a natural flush of warmth without overapplying. Purely because of that ease, I stopped using Shade 5.

These are examples of the darker bronzers in the duo used by themselves.

These are examples of how the bronzers look on me utilizing both halves of the Bronzing Brick in the proportions that I like (and not equal amounts of each shade in the duo).

In case anyone has read my old review, I want to clarify that although I was concerned that my powder might be getting hard pan, it never fully did. The look on the surface seems to really have been caused by the oil based products I was using at the time. I took the photo of Shade 4 when it was untouched, but I can attest to mine still looking normal after at least fifteen uses.

The reason I love this bronzer so much is because it’s incredibly finely milled, super blendable, and gives such a natural look to the skin. It’s matte, but doesn’t look flat. I also like the ability to tweak the color. I can pick up product easily, even with my most delicate natural hair brushes, and it doesn’t have powder kicking up everywhere. This is an expensive product, but I can see how much finer it is than the majority of my powder bronzers. Whether that small difference is worth the increased price is up to the individual consumer. As a bronzer lover, I definitely would not want to be without this.

Lid Lustre in Tea Rose and Starlight

I reviewed the shade Velvet before in my Cocoa Eye Wardrobe post I keep linking, so the other two Lid Lustres are the newest additions to my collection.
I rarely buy single eyeshadows, but most of the Lid Lustres are known for their incredible shine and sparkle. I watched many swatch videos and decided that Tea Rose and Starlight were the only remaining shades I wanted.

Tea Rose is supposed to be “infused with Quartz” and “Citrine Extract” is in Starlight. These two might not look as impressive on my eyes when used solo, especially since my camera doesn’t do them justice, but I am rarely disappointed when I use them to amp up the shimmer effect in my eyeshadow looks.
I must admit that these two shades don’t stand out as much on my eyes as Velvet does, but I still like them.

I’ve found that this formula works best when applied with a finger. It has good adherence and very little fallout. It doesn’t fade and it looks smoother if I apply it with a damp brush, but wetting it doesn’t increase the overall shimmer impact.
I don’t get creasing or fading when I use the Lisa Eldridge Liquid Silk Liquid Eyeshadow underneath because it’s a good barrier to prevent the oils from my eyelids from breaking down the eyeshadow. If I use a Lid Lustre on my bare oily eyelids, there will be creasing before it begins to break down fully. So, please be aware that if you have oily lids too, a good primer is likely necessary. I updated my original review with this clarification.

Because I have so much makeup, it’s not unusual for me to eventually stop reaching for a product after I’ve completed the review in favor of starting to use something new. When it comes to these Lid Lustres, I can’t say that they’ve been used often since last October, but the amount is certainly more than I expected!

21:50 Rêverie Eau de Parfum (Sample Size), Suite 302 (Sample Size), and San Ysidro Drive (Sample Size)

The fragrance category is the most subjective category within the realm of beauty, which is why I rarely talk about the perfumes I’ve purchased or sampled. However, it felt like a wasted opportunity to forgo talking about these altogether considering I have 3 of the 4 scents and even the travel sizes are expensive to blind-buy. Perhaps my opinions as a perfume dabbler could still be helpful.

21:50 Rêverie Eau de Parfum – “Tobacco leaves, plum, vanilla pods and Tonka beans blending with the cedarwood.”

The initial impression I get when I spray this is that it’s a sweet fragrance with some amber. After it dries down on my skin, vanilla is definitely the most prominent smell. I like that 21:50 Rêverie features a creamier type of vanilla scent as opposed to sugary.

After about an hour in, the tobacco leaves and cedar come through. This combination of creamy, smoky, and slight woody scent is how it continues to smell for the rest of the day. It projects within a small area in the beginning, but after 2-3 hours it becomes a personal scent. I have to clarify though that I only spray 1-2 spritzes of a perfume on myself, at most, since everyone I interact with in my daily life are incredibly sensitive to fragrances. The majority of perfumes I buy are basically skinscents on me (perfumes are more prone to fading/dulling down on dry skin), which is why I tend to spray my clothes instead. Doing so takes skin chemistry out of the equation. If I just spray my clothes, I can smell this perfume for longer than many others I own.

I must admit that I cannot smell the plum at all, which is disappointing since I love the smell of plums. If I was able to detect it, that would probably be the push I’d need to buy a travel size of this because this is my favorite scent out of the three from VBB that I’ve tried. This is a very nice fragrance, but I don’t love it enough to be willing to spend so much on it, especially since I have to be so careful and so selective about how and when I am able to wear perfumes out of consideration to those around me.

Suite 302 Eau de Parfum– “Black cherry and red peppercorn; rose centifolia, midnight violet, and narcotic musk; plush velvets saturated with papyrus, black leather and masculine tobacco leaf.”

Tom Ford’s Lost Cherry and Kayali’s Lovefest Burning Cherry are some of my favorite perfumes. I love a good cherry fragrance, so I expected to like Suite 302 as much as 21:50 Rêverie or potentially even more.

When this fragrance first hits the air, I can detect the sweet cherry smell, but there is a smoky spice element that overtakes it once it settles onto my skin. To me, it smells like incense.
Thankfully, this scent grows sweeter within the first hour. I can smell more of the cherries. However, after that first hour I smell florals and sweetness mixed with a peppery-spice smell, and that’s basically how it stays for the rest of the day. I don’t consider this a true cherry perfume because of how quickly that specific note just registers as sweet rather than fruity. If I check how I smell midday, I could easily forget there was supposed to be cherries at all. This scent profile overall is interesting, but I don’t like it enough to be willing to spend that amount of money on it.

The projection and longevity of this one is on par with 21:50 Rêverie.

San Ysidro Drive Eau de Parfum – “Passion fruit and pink peony; ocean air infused with rich rose absolute, saffron flower and agarwood; black amber and vanilla”

In the opening, I cannot distinguish what kind of florals are used. There is a sweetness, but it doesn’t register as passion fruit to me. The overall scent of this is bright and uplifting, though not my style as a gourmand lover. I wasn’t very interested in this scent, but I chose it specifically to review since I didn’t want the other free samples, and I have backups of the other two fragrances already.

Fairly early into the wear time, I can smell the saffron and more of the salts and wood. The dominating smell is still “sweet floral” up to that first hour. After that, I can isolate the rose smell and finally the vanilla. Eventually, I can tell there’s amber as well, but that’s as far as it goes. Once the top notes have faded, what is left behind is more my speed, but it’s also a much less unique type of smell.

I also have to admit that I don’t have many fragrances with oud, and the ones I do own are blended with so many other things that I can’t say for sure that I know how oud smells on its own. According to Google, it can be so many things: woody, earthy, animalic/musky, smoky, resinous, and “depending on the origin (e.g., Thailand, Cambodia), it can range from fruity and floral to medicinal, spicy, or leathery.”
So, basically it’s a broad category that can account for practically everything!
San Ysidro Drive had a tiny bit of an incense smell as well, though weaker than Suite 302, so I’m going to guess that that was due in part to the oud.

I don’t know if it’s just my sample, but I think it’s interesting that this projects the most of the three, but its scent is the quickest to fade (after about six hours). Without being able to smell any passion fruit, I’m not a fan of this in the beginning, but I like how it wears as the day goes on. That being said, it’s my least favorite of the three samples and I unsurprisingly don’t have any interest in buying it.

I know Portofino ’97 is popular with a lot of people, but the notes are so far away from the kind I like. It even has patchouli, which I hate 95% of the time. So, I don’t intend to ever try it.
I’m very glad that the brand offers these samples to customers though, and there is a discovery set with all four in case someone does not want to wait to get the complimentary samples one order at a time.

Additional Updates

Eye Wardrobes

Since I posted a First Impression of the Orchid Palette, I wanted update that the quality in this one is on par with Victoria and Cocoa. The mattes are soft to the touch and create low or medium kickup depending on the brushes used. The light purple shade (Shade 2) tends to lean quite pink on my skin tone, but it still looks enough of an orchid-purple color to satisfy me. The deeper purple (Shade 3) doesn’t swatch very well and looks patchy, but that quality is what gives the hazy smokey effect on my eyes that I like. Having a deep shade like this is easier to control. The mattes blend well into each other and although Shade 2 can appear as if it has a bit less pigment than the amount in all the other quads, I think it’s just a matter of this type of color not popping as much on my skintone.
The satin eyeshadow (Shade 1) can be used as a highlighter on my face. I like putting it in the inner corner since it’s much smoother than the shimmer eyeshadow (Shade 4), which is practically a Lid Lustre in pressed form. I don’t get creasing from the shimmer (but I always use an eyeshadow primer or eyeshadow base) and the shine doesn’t fade. It grips to my eyelids well enough that I don’t feel the need for a specific glitter primer or to spray my brush.

I’ve had no issues with longevity, but my eyeshadow looks are so much more impressive when I incorporate the Fig Satin Kajal into the eyeshadow looks. For example, I love how much more purple Shade 2 looks if I apply it on top of Fig. I get so much more depth from Shade 3 as well. The best part though is that my eyeshadow looks practically newly applied by the end of the night when I use the Kajal as my base. I did a side-by-side wear test and could see that without the Kajal, the eyeshadows still looked great, just not as fresh looking. The pictures I take at night aren’t the best representation (due to lighting issues), but I’ll post an example anyway.

Vast Lash

I’ve talked about this mascara in the Cocoa Eye Wardrobe review. Sometimes a mascara gets better over time, but the sample I own did not. An example of how this mascara looks on me is in the Eye Brighter section of this post. I don’t think it looks good on me and my eye lashes are at its best and longest right now because I’m still using the Sweed Eyelash Growth Serum. So, I can officially confirm this mascara isn’t for me. I can’t help but still be curious about the Future Lash mascara, but the brand doesn’t offer samples of it at this time.

Cheeky Posh

I first bought Miniskirt four years ago and it eventually started to smell like crayons, which indicated that it needed to be replaced. Even though I loved the color, which was so similar to Fenty’s Rose Latte, I hardly used it because I had such an issue with the color blending away and transferring. Still, because the Victoria Beckham Beauty brand had quickly risen to be among my top five favorite brands, I wanted to have a usable blush again. So, I decided to repurchase it.
Miniskirt continues to be my favorite shade within the range, so I thought it would be best to stick with that color.

I don’t know if the change in climate or the fact that I’m using different skincare and makeup can explain why I no longer have the same problems as before, but I’m very happy about it! The Cheeky Posh blush is a bit firm, but I am still able to draw a line or stamp the product along my cheeks and blend it out with my brush of choice without it disturbing the foundation under it. The warmth of my skin helps the blush to spread a little more as I work my Rephr LC02 brush into my cheek. Sometimes, out of habit, I still warm it up on my hand before applying it with the brush.

I can’t speak for all the shades, but Miniskirt imparts a good amount of pigment. It still sheers out a bit the more it gets worked into the skin, so I don’t have to worry about applying too much.

This product looks the tiniest bit dewy, but it’s not very emollient or sticky. At most, if I touch my face it just feels like residue left behind from a moisturizer. Setting it with powder eliminates that feeling entirely, but at the cost of turning it completely matte.

Even if I don’t set this with powder, I no longer have the issue of it transferring. If I press a napkin to my cheeks, I can only see the faintest hint of color. That does not mean that this product is long-wearing though. If I don’t use a primer, powder, or some other means to increase the longevity of makeup, this blush significantly fades from my cheeks within six hours. With helper type of products, I can get at least eight hours of wear before the fading starts to be noticeable. Twelve hours in, I can still see a light flush of color on my cheeks. I don’t know how much longer it lasts before disappearing because 8-12 hours is my typical wear test limits.

I honestly don’t know how much use I’ll get out of this because I use powder blushes at least 80% of the time. However, I’m still happy to have a fresh one.

Also, for anyone wondering about the scarf I tied around my hair in some of the photos, it’s the Victoria Beckham Beauty ’97 Portofino Scarf that was a limited edition free gift with purchase item.

I also want to acknowledge that in the time since the Orchid Eye Wardrobe launch, the brand has released a new shade of Posh Lip lipstick and two Colour Wash Bronze Water Tints. I do not intend to buy either products because I’m on a lipstick low-buy and liquid cheek products are not my thing. Plus, the Bronze Tints aren’t likely to work on anyone darker than tan. Whenever I am unsure if a product will show up on me, I try to wait and see if EnamoredBeauty on Instagram will review it (since we have similar taste in makeup), and it was pretty much invisible on her. I also watched reviews of ladies with light to medium skintones being able to pull off wearing both Water Tint shades. The decision to launch only these two colors in similar depths is…interesting.

I’m glad I didn’t have my heart set on trying that product anyway. It also means that this brand review is complete with me having reviewed everything I wanted by the brand. Anything else I buy from VBB in the future should be new products and/or shade extensions to things I love.

Important Note About the Referral Program

Victoria Beckham Beauty has a referral program, which they send reminders about to customers via email. There are very few brands I like enough to want to spread the word about, but because VBB had become one of my favorites, I figured there was no harm in talking about it.
Looking back, I could have thought harder about the fact that although I see everyone I talk to in the comment section here on my blog as friends, as well as those I chat with via social media, they are probably not who the brand meant when they ask customers to “refer a friend.” In hindsight, they most likely meant people I know personally, even though I am extremely close with several online friends across the world that I have never met.
Still, I had the sense to check the fine print details in the email, the Referral Program terms and conditions, as well as the V-Suite Loyalty Program terms and conditions. As of February 2026, there was nothing in there prohibiting customers from sharing their referral codes publicly. There was no warning stating that it’s possible for a referral code to be able to be misused and that if someone misused it, it would endanger the standing between the brand and referrer.
Based on everything I read, there was zero reason to suspect that sharing the link with my friends and strangers via my blog would bring anything but a positive outcome. Posting on my blog would bring more business to the brand than sharing with my in-person friends who don’t buy luxury makeup.

What happened to me is that I shared my referral link/code in one of my Victoria Beckham Beauty reviews. Someone used it and everything was fine. Then, in another Victoria Beckham Beauty post, I wrote a thank you message hoping the person who used my link would be able to see it and I posted my link again. Other strangers used it and that’s when my account got blocked with no warning whatsoever.

I noticed that my year-to-date spending had been reset to zero and I had been knocked back to Tier 1, which is actually the reason I reached out to customer service. It was then that I was informed that whoever else used my referral link, “are using drop-shipping addresses to place their orders which is explicitly prohibited by the terms and conditions.” Therefore, I was kicked out of the referral program, loyalty program, and would not receive any other benefits.

I had to look up what drop-shipping is, and if you use ctrl+f to search for the word “drop” it does not come up at all in the terms and conditions. Accounts with fraudulent activity can be terminated or suspended at VBB’s discretion, which is perfectly understandable. The part that they don’t state is that by posting a referral link for the general public, any fraud that a stranger commits with that link (which a referrer has no control over), will result in them flagging the referrer’s account as participating in fraud as well. Since I don’t normally participate in referral programs, I didn’t know that it was possible for fraud to be committed through a link, and as I mentioned before, there is no warning written about that being possible in the terms and conditions. So, when a customer gets an email asking them to talk about the brand with their friends and encourage them to check out the products, doing so leaves that customer vulnerable to their own account being permanently blocked. Had I known this was possible, I would never have shared it with anyone! Not even my own family!
Another aspect that confuses me is the line in the TOC stating, “Referral benefits are subject to the referral program terms, which are separate from these Terms.” So, I would have accepted getting removed from the referral program, but to have my entire account blocked for something out of my control and not clearly stated anywhere on the website or emails felt unjust.

One other aspect that I keep wondering about is the fact that Influencers/Affiliates talk about a brand and post links and codes publicly. Out of the hundreds and thousands of people who use their codes, there’s no way that none of them are misused (for example if one of the customers continually buys products, uses them, and then returns them). Yet, not a single company would ever hold an Influencer or Affiliate accountable for what a stranger does. So an Influencer who gets paid by a brand is protected from something like this, but a customer who gets a 20% off discount to give more money to a brand is considered undeserving of the same protection.

Feeling quite defeated about the whole situation, I immediately deleted the referral links from my blog. I replied to the email and figured it was 50/50 whether my account would be reinstated or not. Two days later, I got the news that my Uncle (who was also my godfather) had passed away, so I honestly didn’t have any fight in me to post about the situation on social media or do anything further to contest what happened.
I have no issues accepting repercussions if I break terms and conditions, but what I did (posting my link on my public blog) was not listed as a prohibited action. Warning that what someone does with your link can jeopardize your own personal account was not listed either.

Another line in the terms and conditions states, “Any disputes related to the Program should be directed to Victoria Beckham Beauty’s customer service team. We aim to resolve disputes fairly and amicably.”
I can say that this seems to hold true. A few weeks later, VBB wrote back that they reviewed my case and so my account was reinstated. One of the points I had expressed was the fact that the terms and conditions should be updated so that all customers now and in the future will understand what they’re getting themselves into by giving their referral links to anyone, and so they can be aware of the possible repercussions that doing so could bring (not just the positives). I am grateful that the representative on my case accepted and even thanked me for the feedback. The response back to me was very kind and understanding.
This issue was able to be resolved, but it does not change the fact that I feel it is my responsibility to warn readers about the negative side and risks that are possible by sharing your customer referral links with others. I had made a post encouraging people to refer the brand too and thanking the ones who used my VBB link. So, of course I feel a strong obligation to talk about it here in the hopes that this doesn’t happen to anyone else.

This whole thing has not changed how I view Victoria Beckham Beauty products. Other than the Brightening Pencil and Concealer Pen that simply don’t work for me, everything else is a hit. The bronzers and eyeshadows rank in my Top 5 within both of those categories. The Posh Glosses and Satin Kajals are among my favorites as well. The brand got me to spend €66 on a primer, which I am even considering repurchasing in the future. I love many of these products, and based on that I still consider VBB one of my few favorite brands. However, I still have some lingering negative feelings over the whole ordeal. I was so happy initially when my referral link was used, and then what happened afterwards was like getting kicked down several pegs. As if I should know my place as a customer and not try to share things publicly as if I’m an influencer. The benefits of a loyal customer who is in the highest tier of their reward program isn’t anywhere near as important as an influencer with clout. That’s how it felt to me.

My account getting reinstated helped to repair some of the damage, at least enough that I made another purchase since then, but I honestly still have some lingering negative feelings. Regardless, my reviews of VBB products will continue to be unbiased. There’s no denying that they are high quality products with some of my favorite luxury packaging. I don’t expect those aspects to be any different in the future and I hope to only have good things to say about the brand going forward.

Thank you for reading, and I sincerely hope this has been helpful.

-Lili

Chanel Foundation Reviews: N°1 de Chanel, Water-Fresh Tint and Complexion Touch

This is Part 2 of my deep dive into my most recent Chanel purchases. Today’s focus is on the foundations specifically.

I’ve praised the N°1 de Chanel across several posts, but never officially reviewed it. So, I will do so today and showcase the newest shade I own in that line, along with discussing my newest purchases: the Water-Fresh Tint and Water-Fresh Complexion Touch.

N°1 de Chanel Red Camellia Revitalizing Foundation in BD91, BD101, and BD121


This has been my holy grail complexion product since the beginning of 2024. I had dry to normal skin when I lived in Florida, but over there I could still pull off wearing soft matte and natural finish foundations. When I moved to Germany, my skin required way more hydration due to the difference in climate, and most of my previous foundation favorites didn’t cut it anymore (even ones known for being hydrating).

The N°1 de Chanel is accurately described as a luminous and moisturizing foundation with buildable coverage. Although it still doesn’t look ultra glowy on me, it’s the most hydrating foundation in my possession currently. It looks natural-finish in the beginning, and within an hour my face gets a glow that appears as if it’s my own natural oils (as if I have a normal skin type). As the day goes on, that oil level remains the same and doesn’t get greasier. So, I love it for that reason. I also prefer medium coverage (and up) foundations. So, I can apply a small amount with a brush that isn’t so dense to get easy medium coverage or use my typical foundation brushes and 1-2 pumps for the high coverage I tend to aim for.

This foundation is very long-lasting with minimal transfer, depending on how hydrating my skincare products are underneath. My only gripes are the shade availability options, the added parfum/fragrance, and price. It smells like the typical florals from a prestige fashion house, which isn’t bad, but I would prefer for it to not be there. The scent is quite noticeable as I apply it, but thankfully it doesn’t linger in the air for that long.

I own BD91 and BD121 because they were the only shades that had the potential to work on me that I could buy from reputable discount makeup retailers online. Two years ago, I refused to pay $80 on a single foundation that I could not return, and I was uncertain if BD101 or BD111 would be my best shade. I figured at the discounted price I paid, I could get BD91 and BD121 and just mix the two colors if they didn’t work out. As it turned out, BD121 is a little dark, but the biggest issue is that it’s overly orange on me. Whenever I tried to combine the two colors, I could get the right depth, but it was always a little too warm. So, I eventually started using BD91 only, and would just rely on bronzer to balance it out.

Look using N°1 de Chanel in BD91

Attempts to pull off BD91 after my trip back to Florida last April left me feeling dissatisfied. This is why I eventually succumbed to my wishes during the holidays and decided to get BD101 from the Chanel website. In the US, shades BD101 and BD111 used to be exclusive to Chanel. Now, they can both be found at Ulta. In Germany, BD111 doesn’t exist and BD101 can still only be purchased directly from Chanel.

BD101 in the N°1 de Chanel isn’t a whole lot darker than BD91, but it is at least closer to my year-round skintone while in Germany. So, I expected BD101 to be my shade in all other Chanel formulas. I didn’t realize the Complexion Touch range runs slightly light!

Chanel Les Beiges Water-Fresh Complexion Touch in BD101

This product is intended to be hydrating, which it is to an extent, but the finish is natural rather than dewy or luminous. It was my mistake for assuming a foundation with “water” in the name would give my skin a shinier or wetter appearance than the N°1 de Chanel, but it does not. On the bright side, the Water-Fresh Complexion Touch has been transfer-proof. I don’t need to use a setting spray with it, nor setting powder. Also, it does not contain parfum.

What immediately impressed me about this formula is how easily and evenly the pigment microcapsules break into the solution. I can squirt some directly on my face and my brush will break and spread the spheres and blend it into my skin in the same amount of time as any traditional foundation would. When I was using the Rose Inc Tinted Serum, I had to pump it out onto the back of my hand and crush the pigment capsules with my brush first for a bit before transferring the product onto my face, otherwise the pigment would not mix into the solution properly and then would not spread evenly on the face. There would be patches of unblended spheres without enough liquid left to move it around.

As seen in the photo below with comparisons to the Rose Inc Tinted Serum, The Complexion Touch is viscous enough that it is slow to drip when I hold it at an angle, but it still feels light and gel-like on the skin, whereas Rose Inc’s is runny and feels watery. They have a lot of ingredients in common, but Chanel’s feels a bit more emollient and contains more pigment. In my example photo, the Rose Inc pump dispensed double the droplet size, but when I rubbed it, it was still sheerer than Chanel’s. Rose Inc’s product is a true tinted serum. The Complexion Touch is more of a lightweight and buildable light to medium coverage foundation, but it can be applied as sheer as a tint if it’s used with a sponge or a less dense synthetic foundation brush. Perhaps it could be built up to higher coverage, but I can’t do that due to the imperfect shade match. It’s better for me to use as little product as possible.

I miss the Rose Inc product a lot, so I really hoped this would fill the void. Unfortunately, BD101 is a bit too light for me. In this formula, it’s slightly lighter than BD101 in the N°1 de Chanel.

Heavier application. Applied later in the day.
Better lighting. Morning.

Because it’s at least not orange and too dark, I can somewhat pull off wearing this if I bronze up the perimeters, but the whole reason I wanted this was for minimal makeup days. I wanted something that would even out my complexion while being hard to detect on the skin. An ill-fitting shade is a glaring indication that I have makeup on.
Unless Chanel expands the range to include B111, there isn’t another option for me.
The Complexion Touch is technically more expensive than the N°1 de Chanel, at $3.50 per ml vs $2.67 per ml, and yet it didn’t dethrone that foundation. So, perhaps I would not buy another shade even if the brand releases more colors.

This foundation comes with a tiny brush, but it’s too small for me to enjoy using it all over my face. Instead, I’ve used it to apply the Complexion Touch as a concealer under my eyes. I can’t wear my shade alone because my dark circles are so deep that the product looks grey on top of them. However, it did give the Correcteur I mentioned in Part 1 its best results when paired together.

I’ve tried using this as a primer or mixed in with my darker foundations to improve the shade match. Even though this is water-based and some of the combinations were oil-based, that didn’t seem to impact the longevity or change the consistency in a negative way. I was able to successfully get the shades closer to my face color, but unfortunately I kept feeling that every product I used (N1 de Chanel, Rose Inc Tinted Serum, the Water-Fresh Tint, etc) looked better alone than when mixed. For example, when I mixed it with the Rose Inc Tint, it improved the color, but added just enough coverage to prevent it from looking undetectable, while also not managing to give enough coverage for me to like it. Sheer coverage is one thing, but when it’s light coverage, I feel like I may as well try to cover most of my imperfections. I either want a tint that’s so low coverage it just evens out the skin without being able to tell I’m wearing makeup, or having the minimum of medium coverage.

The Complexion Touch has a fair amount of positives going for it, but it isn’t a good fit for me or my preferences.

Chanel Les Beiges Water-Fresh Tint in Deep and Medium Deep

Deep

This is the product I should have started with all along. As I mentioned in the previous section, I want either a veil of color to even out my skintone while looking like my normal skin or an imperfection-erasing foundation. This checks the “nearly undetectable” box! It’s perfect for minimal no-makeup makeup days.

Using my barest amount of skincare with the tint, I get a natural finish with the tiniest bit of glow. The second I apply powder products like highlighters, blush, and bronzer, those are enough to mattify my skin and I lose any luminosity. My face then feels mostly dry to the touch, and the tint doesn’t transfer. A single long pump (pushing it down fully) is all I need to create that veil, or perhaps a tiny bit more if I’m using a brush that isn’t dense.

I need to clarify that this tint is water based and also water soluble. Although I don’t get transfer if my face touches something, I still need to wear a primer underneath if I want any chance of avoiding streak marks if I cry or my face gets wet in some other way.

If I use two full pumps (or 4 smaller pumps) to get medium coverage all over my face, I will be able to feel some of the gel residue when I touch my face, and it will have that kind of wet shine that glycerin (and maybe other ingredients) leave on the skin, similar to MAC Fix+ and other hydrating sprays. Thankfully, I can still get close to medium coverage with three small pumps of tint without being able to feel it on my face.

The tint is still self-setting if I use my typical skincare products underneath, though I will get a little bit of shine as the day goes on. If I use my most hydrating skincare, then my face can surpass the glow of the N°1 de Chanel Foundation. If I don’t use setting powder, it will be dewy for quite a while, but even then it dries down on its own eventually. At most, it’ll feel as if I just have a gel moisturizer on. In my skin’s most hydrated state with the Water-Fresh Tint on, touching my skin will transfer moisture to my fingertips, but no actual pigment from what I can see. When I press a white paper towel to my skin everywhere, there is only the faintest hint of color.

There are times when I’m testing a new concealer or eyeshadows, but I don’t feel like putting on a full face of makeup. Products like this are useful to make me feel a bit more put together.
Of course, I can take a fuller coverage product and just sheer it out. However, if I’m already not in the mood to put in much effort, I’m not going to want to mix products together in that moment either.

The Water-Fresh Tint is runny in consistency and sheerer than the Complexion Touch, but the Rose Inc Skin Enhance Luminous Tinted Serum is still even more watery and with lower coverage. The Complexion Touch and Rose Inc product have more ingredients in common, but there are three ingredients that the Water-Fresh Tint shares with Rose Inc’s Serum Foundation that the Complexion Touch does not. That means that there are only 6 out of 28 total ingredients in the Rose Inc formula that can’t be found in either of the Chanel ones. In my eyes, that adds even more credibility to the rumors that Rose Inc took a lot of “inspiration” from Chanel in making their Luminous Tinted Serum.

Also, neither of Chanel’s Water-Fresh products have that cooling sensation on the skin. I’m not a cosmetic chemist, but it’s possible that it’s merely the benzyl alcohol evaporating on the skin, which according to Google, “extracts heat from the surface and causes a localized, temporary cooling effect.” If this is what’s responsible for the amazing feeling I loved from Rose Inc’s Tint, perhaps it’s for the best that the Water-Fresh ones don’t have it.

The Water-Fresh Tint has added fragrance, but it’s less noticeable than with the N°1 de Chanel Foundation. Again, it’s that kind of classic luxury brand floral smell.

Like the Complexion Touch, this also comes with a brush, though I am more willing to use this one all over the face because flat tops lead to such fast applications of products. Still, a bigger brush is my preferred application tool.
With the Complexion Touch, the capsules were so easy to mix in that I could just use my fingers to apply it to my face if I wanted. Although the Water-Fresh Tint’s capsules mix better and more evenly than the Rose Inc Product, and I can apply this to my face like a normal foundation, it takes extra effort with fingers to get the color fully and evenly dispersed in the solution. So, I recommend using a brush.

No online retailers in Germany have the shade Medium Deep. If a color within my expected shade range is unofficially exclusive to the Chanel website, I can assume that one is going to be my best shade match. So, I bought Deep first to try it (and as a potential shade adjusting product). Deep is a little warmer and darker than I am right now. The coverage level reminds me of the Beekman 1802 Milk Tint SPF 43 Tinted Primer Serum, which I also have in the shade Deep. Thankfully, Chanel’s isn’t as dark as Beekman’s, so I believe I can get away with wearing it. However, I couldn’t stop nagging at myself to get another shade too. That’s how I ended up buying the second one.

For anyone curious, this was the gift bag charm for February/Valentine’s Day!

Like I mentioned in Part 1, one of my biggest gripes with Chanel is the fact that, in Germany, my best shade match is exclusive to their website across all of their foundation formulas. Since they almost never have sales or discounts on their own site, that means I have to pay full price if I don’t want to mix shades or to rely on other products to balance things out.

Photos Compiled from Chanel.com

Considering how much I loved the Rose Inc Skin Enhance Luminous Tinted Serum, and its similar formula to Chanel, I think it’s a great alternative for someone wanting to spend less money (provided they have a shade option and it doesn’t oxidize). To clarify, the Rose Inc Tint starts off as my correct shade, but it looks orange in photos and perhaps when I use certain skincare products with it, but I’ve never been able to figure out which ones cause this.
Chanel’s Tint is $72 and Rose Inc’s Tint is $49. Rose Inc’s product does dry down more in the German climate than when I was in Florida. Over here, Chanel’s is more hydrating. So, it’s a bit of a toss up as to which one I like more. Medium Deep was a deciding factor and ultimately having my better shade match tipped the scales in Chanel’s favor.

In addition to these three photos, I also took a picture of Medium Deep swatched across my cheek (like I did with the shade Deep), but it was not visible at all, so I did not include it here.

Medium Deep is a good match, but it looks even closer when I use the Victoria Beckham Beauty Cell Rejuvenating Illuminator in the shade Golden as my primer underneath.

To sum things up, the N°1 de Chanel Foundation gives the most coverage with the most hydrated finish, and has the biggest shade range of the three. The Water-Fresh Complexion Touch has the second-most coverage and shade range, but it’s the least hydrating. The Water-Fresh Tint has the least amount of shades and provides the lightest coverage, but it’s the second-most hydrating.

It’s clear to me that the N°1 de Chanel Foundation is something I will continue to repurchase, and in my correct shade from now on. However, I’d like to bring up the fact that the Danessa Myricks Yummy Skin Tint Foundation was second on my list of most used foundations in 2025. It’s $39 if you live in the US, and it’s the most similar performing that I’ve found to Chanel’s (with Chanel’s being more hydrating). For some reason, Danessa’s is €51 within the EU, but sometimes the retailer Purish drops the price to 50% off.
Just like the Rose Inc product, I feel that this is another excellent alternative.

I technically don’t need any other foundation, but I do like having a nearly-undetectable option too. So, I am glad I bought the Water-Fresh Tint.
It’s only because the two Chanel products are holy grails to me that I am willing to spend so much on them. However, $100 or €85 is my personal limit at which a foundation won’t become worth it to me no matter how amazing it is. For example, I don’t see myself ever buying the €121 Victoria Beckham Beauty Foundation Drops, the €125 Hermès Plein Air Luminous Matte Skincare Foundation, or even Chanel’s €168 Sublimage L’Essence de Teint.
The €75 for my exclusive shade in the N°1 de Chanel Foundation is the most I’ve ever spent, and I’m not so sure I’ll be willing to try any others this expensive again. I was tempted by the Tom Ford Architecture Radiance Hydrating Foundation, which I could have gotten for €68, but I don’t want to purchase anymore foundations with fragrance in them. Chanel is my final exception on that.

That’s all for today! Thank you for reading!

-Lili



TikTok’s Viral Fwee Lip&Cheek Blurry Pudding Pots Reviewed with Comparisons

I know I’m late to the game on these. Although I don’t have a TikTok account, these pudding pots have become so successful that I’ve been seeing them talked about everywhere in 2025 in particular. For the past few years, I’ve done my best to stop buying cream and liquid cheek products due to their quicker expiry time than powders. This was my reason for not buying the Pudding Pots, but when I saw Fwee’s products become available through German retailers like Douglas and Flaconi, the FOMO grew too strong for me to take! I started with one, then ordered three more, and now I have forced myself to stop at 7 out of the 35 total!

I’ve included photos of what the colors look like in their frosted glass pots, but it doesn’t help. So many of them look identical to each other or look much deeper than how they appear on my skin. I watched so many swatch videos and scrolled through so many photos, yet I still ended up with shades that were unexpected.
So, if anyone reading this has access to these in person to be able to try them out, I highly recommend doing that.

These colorful Pudding Pots don’t just look like desserts. They have a fruity/candy-like smell too. But don’t eat them! Haha.

BLUSHES

Shade Name: My ND04
Undertone: Warm
Description: Natural Nude Coral
Category: Just Me Moment

This has been touted as a “universal” shade. It can be built up enough to show on my skin, but I will probably use this exclusively on the apples of my cheeks going forward. It’s a little lighter of a color than I’m used to wearing on its own, but I still like it. It’s also much lighter on my lips than I would normally wear.

Shade Name: Dear CR01
Undertone: Warm
Description: Warm Peachy Coral
Category: Bestie Moment

Dear is a little more pigmented and even warmer of a color than My, so I think it suits my skintone quite well for a relatively light shade, but I still wouldn’t wear this on my lips.

Shade Name: Feel’n RS01
Undertone: Warm
Description: Rose Coral
Category: Faded Moment

This is supposed to have a warm undertone, but it looks cool toned on me in person. It’s at least the most cool of the seven I own. It’s pretty, but I like it a bit less than the others.

Shade Name: Chill’n MV01
Undertone: Warm
Description: Cooled Down Greyish Brown
Category: Cold-Hearted Moment

I thought this would look way more cool-toned on me based on the description, although it is technically listed as being suited for those with a warm undertone. I can clearly see purple tones in the pot, but for some reason it’s bright pink on my skin. This is probably the biggest twist in expectations vs reality out of the seven I own. I like it more than Feel’n, but it still ranks lower on the list.

Shade Name: Seventeen CR04
Undertone: Warm
Description: Sun-kissed Lively Reddish Coral
Category: Bestie Moment

To me, this is like a darker version of Dear. I prefer this shade, but I try to apply a thin layer (less than pictured) so that it’s a bare flush of brightness since it’s a more poppy color than I expected.

Shade Name: Lyrics RS02
Undertone: Warm
Description: Brown Coral Rose
Category: Faded Moment

This is the warmest shade of the bunch, and most easy to see on my skin, so I thought I would like this the most. However, it’s a bit too warm. I prefer Memories.

Shade Name: Memories RS04
Undertone: Warm
Description: Marsala Rose
Category: Faded Moment

This is the one shade I end up using most often. It’s a little less warm-red and more of a pink-red.

EXPERIENCE

The consistency of this product is like a bouncy mousse. It has a dimethicone-heavy formula, but that is what gives it its slip-like texture with a matte look.
The blurred blush and lip trend that has long been popular across Asia is reaching similar heights in the west due to so many US and European brands now coming out with their own versions. There are so many options to choose from worldwide!

Wet n Wild isn’t fooling anyone with their Mother Fluffer Pudding Blush. It’s a dupe too!

I only really have two blushes that are comparable to Fwee’s Pudding Pots. The first is the Catrice Velvet Pudding Blurring Blush which indeed feels like a creamy pudding and does not have much bounce. The second is the Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Matte Bouncy Blush which has the slip feeling and bounce without the mousse texture that is so easy to be picked up. Rare Beauty’s is more compact in the pan.


I mentioned in my review that I like the Rare Beauty blush only after applying a hydrating spray on top, which gives it some glow. I thought I wouldn’t mind how matte Fwee’s blushes look if I could use the same technique, but it doesn’t transform it, and I have to be careful not to touch my face too soon afterwards because the sprays (e.g. from Pat Mcgrath and Charlotte Tilbury) make the blush susceptible to lifting off before it dries again.
For my skin type and preference for nude blush tones, I actually like Catrice’s product the most! As long as my skin is adequately prepped, the blush doesn’t look flat on me. There are currently only five shades in the line, but the one I own in 040 Maple Mousse is dark-skin friendly. Just like Fwee’s Pudding Pots, the Catrice Pudding Blushes are scented (though they smell like white chocolate rather than fruity/candy). They are less expensive too, but I believe Fwee’s formula consists of slightly more expensive ingredients. Since my main concern is how it looks and performs, that isn’t enough to change my mind about Catrice’s blush being my favorite of the three.

The Fwee Pudding Pot spreads easily enough, it’s non-drying, and a minimal amount doesn’t look cakey. I don’t have issues with longevity when I apply this on top of foundation, but if I’m going for a minimal makeup look, my skin just eats this blush up. I have to apply a heavier amount than I want in order to counteract the fading so that I end up still having visible blush at the end of the day.

For the best blended results, I make a single tap into the pot with my Rephr LC02 brush and blend the product onto the back of my hand, warming it up, before applying it to my cheeks. I might have to build up additional layers if it’s one of the lighter shades, but this way ensures I don’t overapply.

I bought the Fwee Fingerlike Silicone Lip Brush when I realized my brush and fingers won’t be able to get product out of the small opening that easily as it gets used up over time. I can apply a few dots onto my cheeks with the lip brush as well, but I still run the risk of applying too much, and this kind of formula doesn’t diffuse as easily as a powder product. So, I use this tool mostly to apply product onto my lips (which is great thanks to the slanted curve of the soft silicone tip) or onto the back of my hand.

At YesStyle, there are mini sizes of the silicone tip lip brush as well as a full size brush with a bristle type of tip.

Back to the discussion of the Pudding Pots, I haven’t liked any of these as standalone lip products. The colors are too saturated for my taste, yet they look strange if I use a minimal amount because the two spots of darker pigment on my lower lip are obvious to see underneath. The way the color grips around dry patches on my lips is also unflattering. So, I don’t enjoy how they look unless my lips are already in a good state. They are not transfer-proof, but they last fairly well before I need to touch up my lips. Another fortunate thing is that even though I expected this formula to dry out my lips, it doesn’t seem to. It’s comfortable to wear for the mostpart, but it still doesn’t look flattering enough to me even if it’s not drawing out my lip’s moisture. It’s possible that I could like this paired with other lip products for an ombré effect or after I’ve filled in my lips with lip liner, but I haven’t been inspired to try either technique. I prefer to just consider this strictly a blush.

Overall, I think the Pudding Pots are a fun and youthful product. I resisted buying them for so long, and I wish I had the willpower to have been able to keep resisting them simply because I’m not interested in the matte look. I couldn’t turn them into a glowier looking product, the way I did with the Rare Beauty Bouncy Blushes, so that’s unfortunate for me. I think I look better when my skin has some shine to it. For everyone else that loves the blurred matte trend, I can understand why Fwee’s product is so popular. They are reasonably priced and come in so many shades (perhaps even too many). The formula isn’t difficult to work with as long as the product is either warmed up or built up in small layers.

So, I understand why people like these, but I still think they’re a little overhyped. The best aspects about these Pudding Pots are the shade options, fun texture, and packaging which technically other brands could have as well. When it comes to the performance, it isn’t as unique.

I hope that these photos have been helpful. Thanks for reading! Other reviews I recommend are from Tina Tanaka Harris (for video quality showing every shade), Itskrystle (for in-depth information and testing), and Corizus (someone else similar to my skintone).

-Lili

Chanel Holiday Packaging Plus Concealers, Powders, Blush, and Lip Serum Reviews

This is Part 1 of my deep dive into some of the latest Chanel makeup releases from their permanent lines. Part 2 will be dedicated to Chanel’s foundations.

For the holidays, but starting in October 2025, Chanel gave customers the option of choosing special holiday gift packaging instead of their classic white with black-trim bags and boxes. The options were a smaller white bag, a larger deep blue bag, and then I’m not sure how many box varieties there were. The ribbons were dark blue with some glitter specks and the pattern design had a mix of gold, silver, and blue coloring. They were absolutely stunning!

When opting for the holiday packaging, customers could only choose whether they would get the large gold camellia flower charm with a smaller silver comet/star or the large gold comet with the smaller silver camellia. Over the course of the winter season, I ended up getting both.

If you’re already familiar with me (and this blog), you know I love scoring a great deal. I’ve discussed how in Germany, there are several legitimate online retailers that sell newly launched Chanel makeup at a discount from 15-30%. So, for those wondering why I ended up ordering directly from Chanel’s website, it is because I wanted my better shade match in their foundations and unfortunately here my shade is exclusive to Chanel.

As for the concealers, although the website doesn’t have the “exclusive” marker posted next to any of the shades, I could not find any retailer in Germany that sold darker than B40. All of the retail websites had six shades available at most. Chanel has two actual color correctors that were released with these concealers called Peach and Amber. If a retailer had one, it was only Peach. So, I didn’t have the option of buying any of these anywhere else, except directly through Chanel.

Chanel Ultra Le Teint Le Correcteur Concealer (Ultrawear All-Day Comfort Flawless Finish Concealer) in BD91 and B110

This concealer launched in Europe in September 2025, but I didn’t realize (until I saw the flood of videos in January 2026) that it hadn’t come to the US until this year. I bought mine in October last year, so I’ve had plenty of time to test this product.

There is currently no BD101, which I assume would have been my closest shade. BD121 has always been a little dark for me and too warm. I figured having some orange color correcting effects from BD121 wouldn’t be so bad, but having a concealer that’s too dark is a problem. So, I chose BD91 as the next best option with a golden undertone.
I also wanted to see just how neutral B110 would be, and to figure out how deep it is (compared to my estimate of BD121), so I made the decision to get that shade as well.

Photos from Chanel

This concealer became the instant holy grails and number 1 concealers of Charlotte Holdcroft, Han Beauty 101, and French For a Day, so I thought surely I would like it too!

Chanel BD91 Concealer and 40 Medium Plus Powder

Every time I put on this perfume-free concealer, I have high hopes. My undereyes look so much smoother than any other concealer thus far has been able to achieve, and the coverage is great! When I pair it with the brand’s Universal Libre Powder, it looks like a match made in heaven! Unfortunately for me, it just doesn’t have the longevity I need.

Six hours is the longest it can go before I see my dark circles underneath what remains of the concealer. In the worst circumstances, my natural oils fill the creases and breaks it down within fifteen minutes if I haven’t powdered it enough. In other circumstances with powders heavier than Chanel’s (such as my go-to Charlotte Tilbury or even the Huda Easy Bake Powder), the concealer gradually fades to the point that I can see my under eye darkness again within three or so hours.

Technically, if I continually touch up my under eyes (for example smoothing out the creases with the remnants of what is left on my concealer brush and then powdering it with the remnants of what is on my setting brush), it can look “passably” faded between 8-10 hours before it’s not salvageable anymore. However, I consider that very unrealistic. I don’t like to babysit my makeup.

I’ve tried pairing it with the Milk Hydro Grip Eye Primer (which I also use with my KVD Good Apple Concealer), tried using less concealer and less powder, using more concealer and more powder (better outcome), waiting a minute for it to settle before setting it with powder, setting the concealer with powder immediately after applying it (better outcome also), doing alternate layers of concealer > powder > more concealer > and more powder, and mixing it with a few other concealers. I’ve tried using setting spray, drying my undereyes, keeping my undereyes moisturized. Nothing I do can get me more than six hours of nice wear time.

I don’t usually show all day wear tests because I cannot figure out how to get consistent lighting. The last photo though is especially off because I forgot to turn on my usual lights.

If I had to guess what’s affecting how the concealer wears, I would say it’s probably the combination of my natural oils breaking the concealer down (it’s supposed to be waterproof not oil-proof) and the hydrating skincare ingredients, such as glycerin and sodium hyaluronate, that my skin soaks up. Maybe there’s an ingredient that causes an increase in my oil production, since my undereye skin is usually not oily on a consecutive basis, yet it tends to be oily each time I wear this concealer. Maybe the consistency is too creamy and the concealer cannot stay put in the lines of my eyes.
The Ultra Le Teint Le Correcteur has film formers that are meant to flex with movement and increase the concealer’s adhesion to the skin, which I am prone to believe considering how easily the concealer smooths back into place with a brush instead of coming off even more after being disturbed on the skin. Perhaps it’s too creamy, since those kind of concealers have never worked for me (e.g. Nars Radiant Creamy Concealer and the Creamy version of Tarte Shape Tape).

Recently, I decided to try using the Les Beiges Water-Fresh Complexion Touch as an undereye primer for this concealer (since it’s supposed to be usable as a concealer too). This combination gave me six hours of wear before needing to be seriously touched up. However, if I use too much of the Complexion Touch or not enough Ultra Le Teint Le Correcteur and powder on top, it gives worse results. Essentially, finding the right balance time and again is difficult.

I love how this concealer looks in its best state, to the point that I am still using it. However, I just wear it on days I know I will not be leaving the house and when I’m less likely to have visitors.

BD91 is a tad more yellow with not enough warmth to be a perfect shade match for me, but I never wear B110. It turns out that shade is still too dark and the neutral undertone looks even more unnatural on me. So, I at least confirmed for myself that B110 is not a shade option for me. I need to stick with the golden tones. Photos of this are in the powder section.

Based on my experience, I can’t really recommend this product. I don’t mind having to use a second product to prime my eye area, but to still need to do touch ups throughout the day is bothersome. I’m willing to buy expensive makeup if it’s going to make my life easier; this one did not.
I acknowledge that other people have not had the same problems with it that I do. If it was able to last at least 8 hours without needing a touch up, I’d have been over the moon about this concealer. Unfortunately, it just didn’t work out and I’ve gone above and beyond already in testing various methods.

Since this released and until February, the only reviewer I found who had a similar experience to me has been Sofia Sees Beauty. Ironically, she likes the Prada concealer more (though she doesn’t recommend that either) and in the majority of the Chanel vs Prada videos I watched, everyone preferred Chanel’s concealer. So, there seems to be certain skin types that this product just doesn’t work for.

Chanel Universal Libre Powder (On-the-Go Format) in 40 Medium Plus and 50 Medium Intense

Based on the ingredient lists I can see on Chanel’s website, the main differences between the original format of this powder and the refillable “to-go version” is that the standard contains silica instead of cellulose, plus the additional ingredients towards the bottom which are sodium lauroyl glutamate, lysine, and magnesium chloride.

Since I consider the powders to be pretty much the same, and the two products are similarly priced at the discount websites, I opted for the newer packaging. There is a huge difference in the amount of product though, considering the non-refillable jar contains 1 oz (30 grams) of product, but the refillable packaging contains 0.21 oz (6 grams). I’ve only ever used up one powder, so it’s not a concern to me, but that could be a factor for others.
I also heard that the jar packaging is super messy to handle. I have always kept the stickers over the holes of my loose powders and punctured just a few so that I have way more control over how much comes out. I’m not sure if even that tactic would be enough. I find that the refill packaging is still messy if I don’t use my typical methods.

I hate having powder float everywhere, so I only punctured the 8 innermost holes in the sticker. I knock the base to tip the powder contents out onto the lid of the refill. I use what’s needed. I pick up the excess powder back up with my brush to clean off the lid. If there’s still too much powder left, then I use the powder puff that’s included (in both the full to-go packaging and the solo refills) to wipe off the rest. Then I place the puff back over the sticker and holes, and close everything up!
The reason I clear the lid each time is so that the top of the puff will remain looking clean.

I have both the full packaging and a separate refill. The first shade I bought (50 Medium Intense) looks light in the swatches below, but it deepens up a little on my skin. I can wear it on my face, but not under my eyes. Also, the closure part of the refill lid is so easy to open that I worried if I stored it anywhere other than flat on a shelf that I’d have a massive mess to clean up. So, I put it back in the unicarton on my shelf and I waited for a good sale to get the complete packaging in the shade 40 Medium Plus. That one is perfect for my undereyes!

As far as I’m aware, this powder is meant to lightly mattify and be translucent, rather than offering coverage like a powder foundation. So, I was surprised to discover that the shades 70, 91, 121, and 152 exist. I haven’t found a single retailer in Germany that sells anything darker than 50. The darker shades are only on the Chanel website.

I’m glad that all the hype about this powder being dry-skin friendly is true. It is a super finely milled and thin powder. It doesn’t work as well with my concealers that require stronger powders to lock them in, but I bought this specifically to pair with Chanel’s concealer. Although I still have problems with the wear time of the concealer, the Chanel powder has given me the best results with it. I find it to be slightly blurring and this is the most lightweight loose powder I own that can successfully give me a soft matte finish without making my face look drier. That’s why I don’t think this will work well for people with oily skin. If I use the bare minimum of skincare with most of my foundations, this powder will keep me matte for most of the day, but when my products give me dewy skin and I use the Chanel Powder, I become shiny again within four hours. I imagine that length of time would be increased for someone who doesn’t have dry skin like mine.

I like Chanel’s powder more than the uber expensive Guerlain Parure Gold Powder because I can’t smell any fragrance (even though this does have parfum listed in the ingredients).

Chanel Hydra Beauty Micro Sérum

I didn’t know about this product’s existence until Kackie Reviews Beauty talked about it in one of her videos. The way she described it was so fascinating that I bought it the very next day!
The retail price is €56 ($60) but I got mine from Parfümerie Pieper for €39.

I usually take product descriptions with a grain of salt, but Chanel’s is pretty on point with what I have experienced. According to them: “The Micro Sérum Lèvres is a dual-phase formula consisting of an aqueous base with hyaluronic acid and White Camellia Extract, which have a moisturizing, plumping, and soothing effect, and an oily phase with White Camellia OFA (Oleofractioned Active) micro-droplets which melt into skin and lock in hydration.
Furthermore, “this lightweight and water-fresh serum immediately absorbs and forms a thin protective layer on lips, keeping them hydrated for up to 24 hours** and leaving them perfectly prepped for makeup.

This serum “plumps” in the sense that it fills in lip lines, and its shine gives an appearance of fullness, but this is not a lip plumper that would cause the lips to be enlarged. Chanel doesn’t call this a lip plumper, but many customers would assume it could double as one by stating that this has “plumping effects.” This is the only aspect of the website description that is questionable.

After applying the Hydra Beauty Micro Serum, I’m left with a somewhat shiny finish on my lips, which have the tiniest bit of grip. I can wear this alone as a gloss or balm, but the occlusive gel layer is so lightweight that I need to reapply it at least once or twice throughout the day, especially since it’s easily removed while eating. When I rub my lips together, it feels truly unlike any other lip product I’ve used. Also, this is not fragrance-free, since it has a slight fruit-candy type of scent.

What makes this a useful product to me is how quickly it seeps in to smooth and hydrate my lips, combined with its priming abilities. I have spent a long time seeking products that nourish and condition my lips. All of my favorites are thick and/or sticky, oily, and basically don’t have the kind of consistency that I can use to continue improving the condition of my lips (or prevent my lips from drying further) while wearing other products on top. Products like the Ami Colé Lip Treatment Oil, Clarins Lip Comfort Oil, and Eadem Le Chouchou Peptide Lip Balm are better at improving the condition of my lips over the course of a full day, but this Chanel product is what I’ve been using when I want my lips to look better fast, and wiping those other products off my lips would leave too much residue behind. That occlusive layer is what makes my favorites and so long-lasting, while also preventing me from using them as lip prep products. This is where the Chanel serum fills a void in my collection.

The reason I wear lip glosses and balms so much isn’t just out of enjoyment of low maintenance products. It’s also out of necessity. Although this lip serum can make matte lipsticks look satin, I’ll take that over not being able to wear my lipsticks that often due to my chronic dry lips issue.

So, this isn’t deeply nourishing to me. It’s a quick fix. According to the statistics Chanel provided, “After 4 weeks of use, lips look 49%* more plump and 70%* smoother. Natural lip colour appears 62%*** more vibrant.

I have not used this product daily for 4 weeks straight, so I cannot comment on how true that sounds or not. Based on at least one week of consistent use, I don’t think the ingredients are enough for my lips to be nourished long-term. This serum has come in handy so many times as a lip primer since I bought it in September. I have only ever used a couple of actual lip primers, so I can’t say for sure how much better this is from other lip preps out there. Since I’m not interested in spending even more money trying to test other products like this, I will stick with what I know.
Should I ever use up this product, I hope that I’ll be able to get another on sale again!

This lip serum is useful to be able to wear less comfortable lipstick formulas. However, if I stick to only buying balms that condition and deposit a nice amount of color, I wouldn’t need the Chanel Hydra Micro Serum as much. If I downsize my lip collection each year, there may reach a point that it will no longer be necessary to have a product like this around.
That day isn’t today though, and I am happy I’ve got it!

Chanel Les Beiges Water-Fresh Blush in Intense Coral

I’ve been avoiding buying liquid and cream blushes for over three years, so I had no plans to buy the Chanel Blush until I watched Alicia Archer’s video.

Admittedly, my first choice for the color would have been Deep Bronze, but it’s a Chanel exclusive shade. So, I went with my second favorite option and ordered Intense Coral from Flaconi at a discount.
Intense Coral shows up on me and can be built up in more obvious layers, but it might not look that great on someone with a skintone several shades darker than mine.

Intense Coral reminded me of the Joues Contraste Intense Cream-to-Powder Blush in the shade Radiant Rose, but Radiant Rose is the tiniest bit darker with a little more warmth.

The watery gel-like consistency and the fragrance are the same as the Water-Fresh Tint. The blush has half the amount of product, but it isn’t half the price of the tint ($72 vs $56). The price per ounce or milliliters for the blush is even more expensive here, considering it’s €67 for the tint and €55 for the blush.

I like the hydrated feel of the blush on my skin and that it dries down. One pump is enough to give a beautiful flush to both cheeks. Although I can blend it well with fingers, I prefer the control I get with a brush application by pumping the blush into the back of my hand and coating the brush bristles evenly before alternating pouncing the product onto both cheeks.

When I wear this on my bare skin, even on top of skincare, this has terrible longevity. The blush is significantly faded within a few hours. At a minimum, if I wear my typical skin prep products and the Chanel Water Fresh Tint underneath the blush, it can last most of the day with an acceptable amount of fading. However, it is still susceptible to being easily removed by liquids. On one of the testing days, my watery eyes caused the skin tint and blush tint to disappear where the droplets rolled down my cheek. Adding a primer to the prep steps is enough to combat the water-soluble issue and prevent the blush from fading.

When I wear the Water Fresh Blush on top of my Chanel N1 Foundation, I have no longevity issues at all. I figure that’s because it provides an even stronger barrier between my skin and the blush. So, although this product is appealing to makeup minimalists and those that want the most lightweight layers of product with the most skin-like finishes, this blush has to be used in specific ways to get it to last. I’d also like to note that due to lighting, the blush is easier to see in person than in my photos.

I like the blush color, the dewy looking finish, the seamless blend, and how easy it is to use despite being a liquid form. Usually liquid blushes are the most troublesome for me to work with.
The €36 I paid for this was a fair price for Chanel makeup. I like this product a lot, but I don’t think it will become a favorite purely because I am a powder blush fan. I wanted to be able to wear this all day on bare skin and have it still be long-lasting. I haven’t tested this idea yet, but if adding a face primer to my cheeks is enough to fix the longevity problem without needing to wear a tint/foundation too, this could make me use this blush more often. I’d be able to wear it on low-makeup days as planned.

That ends this post! I hope it has been helpful. Please keep an eye out for Part 2 if you enjoyed this!

-Lili

Pat Mcgrath Bronze Seduction and Divine Rose Palettes

In May 2025, there was a sale on Pat Mcgrath’s website that applied to bundles. So, I was able to get two Mothership Palettes for €73 each. Both of these palettes have been available for several years, so I can’t explain why I suddenly wanted them, but I did.

Because these palettes are “old” in terms of release date (2018 for Bronze Seduction and 2019 for Divine Rose), I feared the Motherships purchased in 2025 wouldn’t have the same formulas as the original launches. I cannot say whether the Moonlit and Sunlit Seduction Palettes were simply free of the four “special shades” in the right section of those palettes or if all of the later eyeshadow formulas were tweaked. I just know that Petalmorphosis has very different shimmers compared to what is in Motherships 1-9. Considering the additional formula differences among the brand’s 5-pan and holiday palettes, I wasn’t sure if PML quit working with the same lab entirely.

Thankfully, the quality of my new palettes match that of my Mothership 3. Even though there are no more “special shades” in Motherships 10-12, the special shades continue to be produced in the palettes that always had them.
It’s great to confirm that the mattes are still pigmented and easy to blend. They layer well with each other. The shimmers are opaque and very impactful. The duochromes and iridescent shades are a bit flaky and can be messy, but they still have that “wow” factor!

Mothership V: Bronze Seduction

There really isn’t much to say in terms of a review. These are the high quality eyeshadows I know and love from the brand. They’re soft and powdery without excessive kickup. They’re blendable, layer well, and the shimmers are intense enough that I don’t feel the need to dampen my brush to apply them. They don’t crease and they’re overall wonderful to work with!

Xtreme Aubergine is the only one that requires a little extra time to blend because it can stick and be patchy. It’s so pigmented that it can be easy to go overboard. So, I use something small and pointed like the Sonia G Crease One for outer corner work. I build it up carefully and slowly, which prevents me from having issues.

I rarely use red eyeshadows, so that was a big reason I wasn’t interested in this palette in the past. Then, it dawned on me that if I exclude Blitz Flame, this is basically a brown neutral palette. I was in my colorful phase in 2018, but now I appreciate neutrals again, and find this palette to be super appealing.

After buying Bronze Seduction, I used it on and off for a few months, but then it took a backseat to other new launches (and even the YSL Over Brun Quad and Natasha Denona Mini Gold). Normally, I would take that as an indication that I shouldn’t have made this purchase since I don’t use it enough. This time, I can’t regret it because of how beautiful the colors are and the knowledge that it’s available to me whenever I do have the urge to use it. Considering everything going on with the brand right now, I appreciate the nostalgia of having a palette that reminds me of a time when PML was in its prime.

Mothership VII: Divine Rose

Getting me to want a palette with light eyeshadows and a low contrast color story was a hard sell, especially during my phase when I was sick of pinks, but PML managed to do it in the end. The best shade I have in this palette to create depth with is Xtreme Mahogany, and it’s not quite enough to satisfy me. However, there are plenty of dark colors across the other Mothership Palettes that I can pull from.
I still liked all the looks I created for this post, but I’ve needed to reach outside of this palette for all the looks I’ve recreated since then.

Divine Rose performed just as well as Bronze Seduction and gave me no performance issues.
I really wanted the YSL Quad in 825 Burning Desire, but after seeing Han Beauty 101’s comparison swatches, I decided there were too many shades in common. YSL, Victoria Beckham Beauty, and Prada make my favorite luxury eyeshadows, so the fact that Divine Rose was good enough to keep me from buying Burning Desire says a lot.
Still, I honestly haven’t used this palette very much after the testing phase ended. I have to be in a very specific mood when I want to wear these type of colors, but that’s precisely why having Divine Rose is a good thing. The Tarte Tartelette Juicy Amazonian Clay Eyeshadow Palette was supposed to be my ultimate pink palette and get me to stop buying more. So far, Divine Rose has been the one to curb my appetite.

2025/2026 UPDATED RANKING FROM FAVORITE TO LEAST FAVORITE:

  • 1. Mothership III – Subversive
  • 2. Celestial Nirvana (5 pan) – Bronze Bliss
  • 3. Luxe Quad – Interstellar Icon
  • 4. Mothership VIII – Divine Rose II
  • 5.Mothership V – Bronze Seduction
  • 6.Mothership XII – Petalmorphosis
  • 7. Celestial Nirvana (5 pan) – Nude Allure
  • 8. Mothership IX – Huetopian Dream
  • 9. Mothership VII – Divine Rose
  • 10. Bijoux Brilliance (5 pan) – Bronze Ecstasy
  • 11. Pat Mcgrath Labs x Star Wars Eye (5 pan) – The Golden One
  • 12. Mega MTHRSHP Celestial Divinity
  • 13. Pat Mcgrath x Star Wars MTHRSHP Galactic Gold
  • 14. Bijoux Brilliance (5 pan) – Lunar Nightshade
  • 15. MTHRSHP Subversive La Vie En Rose
  • 16. Mini Eye Ecstasy: Subversive
  • 17. Pat Mcgrath Labs x Star Wars (5 pan) – Divine Droid
  • 18. Blitz Astral Quad – Nocturnal Nirvana
  • 19. Pat Mcgrath x Star Wars MTHRSHP Dark Galaxy
  • 20. MTHRSHP Rose Decadence
  • 21. Mega MTHRSHP Celestial Nirvana
  • 22. MTHRSHP Velvet Liaison

I can’t end this post without mentioning the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy filing of Pat Mcgrath Labs. Considering this is my number one favorite mainstream brand, it saddens me to see them in this position. At the same time, PML has been too focused on trying to follow the trends of what sells (overuse of pinks and neutrals particularly after the success of Divine Rose I) rather than fostering innovation. There are many other reasons that contributed to customers being unhappy and unwilling to spend as much money on the products that have been released in the past three to five years.

I am still holding out hope that they can make a comeback. It has long been suspected that Pat Mcgrath has had much less creative control in the last years, and the success of the Louis Vuitton makeup line shows that people are still interested in her vision. If she can take back the reigns in the Creative Director position, and the business end of things gets sorted, there could still be hope! PML still has so much potential!

That’s all for now. I’m going to treasure my Motherships even more now!

Thank you for stopping by!

-Lili

Discussing Nars Formula Changes with New Blushes and Highlighter Review

By now, many brands have been moving towards being talc-free due to upcoming changes in EU Regulations, but Nars was among the first by reformulating their bronzers in 2023 and the blushes in 2024. What baffles me is that the formulas of their products are not consistent across the board.

As I mentioned in my review of the Hot Escapes Palette, the highlighters in there share the same names as the highlighters in the Light Reflecting Luminizing Powders range, but the ingredients don’t match up, nor even all of the colors. This has been a growing annoyance for a lot of customers hoping to repurchase their favorite shades, only to discover that they are not identical. For example, my reformulated bronzer in 06 is darker than the even newer 06 bronzer from the Hot Escapes Palette. My older Dolce Vita blush is similar, but not identical to the newer one either.
It’s also confusing to buy a product expecting a certain finish and texture, only to end up with something different. The highlighters are a prime example of that.

In an effort to finally put my curiosity to rest, I bought a Light Reflecting Luminizing Powder to compare with what is in the Hot Escapes Palette. I also purchased three blushes in the new formula to compare to the older one.

Nars Powder Blushes in Dolce Vita, Infatuated, and Orgasm Rush

A change that Nars made, that I can definitely support, is that these blushes are refillable. Less packaging being produced is better for the environment, but of course I like the ability to just purchase a pan of blush for a cheaper price and be able to stick it in an empty magnetic palette. Unfortunately, Nars hasn’t improved that option since the launch. At the time that I’m writing this in 2026, there are still only 5 shades available as refills. None of those are dark-skin friendly.

The cost of refills from the Nars are €29 each, but I have been able to get the full products from Flaconi for €19 each. So, I don’t have much incentive to buy refills or purchase directly from Nars anyway.

My history with Nars blushes has been long and unstable. To sum up the gist of my Rediscovering Nars Blushes post: I tend to like them, but I rarely love them. They almost always play second fiddle to my MAC blushes.

The matte blush from Hot Escape shares the same ingredients as the current matte single blushes, but the order is shuffled around. The shimmer blush from Hot Escape contains no kaolin, but the current shimmery singles have some (and definitely less than the mattes).

One of the biggest reasons I didn’t like some of Nars’ past blushes is because they looked a little dry on me. So, I thought if the current line of powder blushes use less kaolin, that could have explained why I prefer the blush singles over the older ones, but it’s still the second ingredient in the matte formula. Now, I’m unsure what is responsible for the reformulated blushes looking better on me.

Dolce Vita is described as a “matte dusty rose” and Infatuated as a “matte deep plumberry” but I can see faint shimmer within the surface of the blush pan of Dolce Vita. I cannot see that shimmer in swatches, but there’s a slight glow on my cheeks in the photo below. Both of these blush shades look much softer on my cheeks than the previous Nars blushes. They’re pigmented, but they build color slower than their predecessors. I’ve always given credit to Nars when they’ve launched dark-skin friendly shades. However, they tended to be very intense in pigment and/or bold in color. For someone like me who prefers subtle natural flushes of color and the occasional pop, the lack of nude options is why I often turned to MAC instead.

Although I love the shades Taos and Liberte in the old formula, I didn’t wear them that often because of the issues of being easy to overapply and looking drier on my cheeks than I like. The reformulated blushes don’t have these issues.

I like my new version of Orgasm Rush better than Night Swim because it’s slightly more buildable and blendable. They don’t seem hugely different in terms of texture (perhaps Orgasm Rush is the slightest bit silkier), yet the small changes made all the difference to me.

The only time Nars used to put this much shimmer in a blush was in their baked gelee formula, so I was surprised to see the shimmer level of Night Swim, and see shades like Orgasm Rush in the permanent blush line. I never ended up reviewing the Nars Orgasm Four Play Blush Quad, but I had the shade Orgasm Rush already from there in the baked gelee formula. Unfortunately, I cannot compare that one with the current talc-free version I own because I left it in the US.


I really like how these single blushes look on me, and I am more likely to reach for these over any others from Nars. That being said, there are still plenty of blushes I like even more from other brands. So, I will only buy additional shades in the future if they are truly breathtaking colors that I can’t resist.

Of course, in true Nars fashion, these relatively new and reformulated blushes aren’t enough. According to @VoceMagazine on Instagram, Nars will be releasing Light Reflecting Luminizing Blushes in seven shades in April or May. I’m guessing these will also be refillable since they share the same compact design as the Light Reflecting Luminizing Powders range.

The link to Voce’s swatch video can be found HERE.

If anyone is wondering, I don’t intend to buy these upcoming blushes.

HIGHLIGHTER

In October 2025, I purchased the refill of the Light Reflecting Luminizing Powder in the shade Ophelia for €19 from Flaconi. I already figured this would not become a favorite of mine based on the review from NikkifromHR, as we have similar highlighter preferences. However, I couldn’t rid myself of the need to buy it in order to personally see how it differed from the Hot Escape highlighter. These kind of decisions based on intense curiosity is something I’m trying to get better about in 2026!

As expected, this did not become a favorite. If I use enough highlighter to get easily visible shine, it’s more metallic looking than I typically go for and the individual shimmer particles are easy to spot when you click the photo to see the enlarged version.
It’s smoother than I expected and it’s pretty when looking at it from afar, but it’s still not really to my taste. It’s more important to me to have products that look great in person over ones that look better in photos.

The smallest amount of Ophelia is comparable in luminosity to a light(ish) application of Skinny Dip from the Hot Escape III Palette. Skinny Dip blends into my skin more because it’s darker, but I also find the shimmer particles to be less reflective in a good way. It’s all a matter of preference though and someone else could still love the Light Reflecting formula.

The photos above and below are some examples in different lighting, plus unblended vs blended swatches.

I prefer Skinny Dip, but even that isn’t my favorite. I’ve created many posts featuring highlighters that I prefer even more. Additional ones not included on that list are the Prada Light Glowing Highlighter Powder as my current number one and the Hindash Gradient Highlighter. I love the effect of the Prada one so much that I could be swayed into never buying another highlighter again if not for it being so heavily scented! In any case, I’ll be reaching for Skinny Dip instead of Ophelia if I ever want to create a “Full Face of Nars Products” type of look.

One final thing to note about the Light Reflecting Luminizers is that the refills have plastic mesh backing, so the product is not housed in a pan. I could try to attach a metal sticker to the bottom, but I just store mine within the original refill packaging and not an empty magnetic palette.

That’s all for today. I hope you enjoyed reading and visiting this blog!

-Lili

YSL Blush Honey Moon (new), Bronzer, and Limited Edition Loveshine Review

I’ve had these products for several months, so I decided I may as well combine them into one review!

Yves Saint Laurent Make Me Blush Bold Blurring Powder Blush in 12 Honey Moon

YSL started off the year releasing three additional shades to their powder blush line. I first reviewed Peachy Nude, Restless Rosé, and Nocturnal Nude HERE. Then, I discussed Rose Haze and Spicy Berry HERE. My versions of Nude Lavalliere and Berry Bang came from the brand’s first face palette in Golden Oasis HERE.

Although I have plenty of the brand’s blushes already, I have an especially hard time resisting the ones in their shimmer finish. So, I purchased this while at a slight discount via Flaconi.
There are technically only shimmer/satin and matte finishes listed in the Make Me Blush Bold Blurring Blush line, but among the shimmers there are a few as sheer as highlighters such as 69 Lavender Lust and another of the three new ones called 10 Stardust Love.

Before we move onto the review, I feel it’s necessary to point out that YSL has already released a number 12 blush, but it’s called Nocturnal Nude. I assumed the duplicate number was a typo or simply an oversight, seeing as how there are at least 18 shades in the range, plus a few in the liquid formula as well. It’s not unbelievable that there could be a mixup. However, Nocturnal Nude was one of the blushes that did not get released at every retailer. In fact, I’m not even sure if it ever launched in the US. I had heard people living in the US had to get theirs from Selfridges in the UK. As for Germany, the only two places I can confirm had Nocturnal Nude was Flaconi and the YSL-Deutschland website. Nocturnal Nude was removed from Flaconi’s website and it has been listed as out of stock at YSL for at least six months.
So, it seems as if that blush has been discontinued. It’s still a strange choice to reuse the number, even though Honey Moon is basically an amped up version of the shade in terms of depth, shimmer, and pigmentation levels.

I’m pleased with this new addition, but I hope YSL will consider making a deep brown-pink nude shade someday, since we already have three that lean orange.

In the second photo, I changed my eyeshadow crease shade and added the YSL Loveshine on my lips.

The majority of the blushes in this line are pigmented, but the lighter shades are unsurprisingly easier to control. Honey Moon isn’t as intensely pigmented as Spicy Berry (which could appear patchy in specific circumstances), but I still need to apply it lightly. Unlike many blushes that just need an wispy brush to build up the product slowly, the consistency of the blush powder is on the thicker side. To ensure the best application, I use brushes that have both an airy and medium dense section of the brush (for instance 3D styles or angled brushes). This way, it can pick up and apply a small amount of product from the looser side, but the other part of the brush has decent buffing power. My rephr Kōyō brush has always been perfect for that, but I can even use the Hakuhodo G6440 if I only do a single tap into the blush surface before buffing the color all over. Using a loose brush to apply with and switching to a buffing brush to blend it in works too.

Of the blushes I own, Spicy Berry and Nocturnal Nude are definitely satins because they have a sheen, but the shimmer particles aren’t as easy to see after being blended in. Restless Rosé has more obvious shimmer, as does Honey Moon. As long as I keep my blush layer of Honey Moon sheer, and especially if I use a blurring and/or finishing powder on top, texture isn’t as emphasized. So, I don’t mind this shade being so shimmery.

Other than being mindful about which brush is used, I don’t have any other issues with Honey Moon. It has good longevity and no added parfum. It just comes down to preferences whether someone will like this or not.

Yves Saint Laurent All Hours Hyper Bronze in #5

After getting the Golden Oasis palette with its blushes and highlighters, I couldn’t let go of the feeling that if I bought the bronzer, that would be the last face powder product from YSL that I cared to test out. Curiosity finally got the better of me and I caved.

Based on the countless reviews I saw, I knew the current darkest shade was my only option. #5 in the pan looks like it will be quite dark, but packing on the product still results in a fairly sheer application. It having a very thin consistency aids in its buildable nature.
I was relieved to see the hype surrounding this bronzer wasn’t exaggerated. The matte airbrush finish is akin to the Victoria Beckham Beauty and Charlotte Tilbury bronzers, though YSL’s is slightly drier looking than them on my face. It also leans red, but thankfully isn’t overly red to the point that I wouldn’t want to use it. Still, I’d prefer if the brand had a shade extension with a deep golden option.
I heard someone say that YSL’s pressed powder range goes even deeper than the bronzers, so I once considered using that as a bronzer, but I decided not to try that out of fear that the color could be even more sheer.

Bronzer vs Completed Look

I’ve had no longevity issues with the product. It’s blendable and doesn’t require any special brushes. If I want to maintain that sheer quality, I use my airy brushes. If I want maximum color payoff, like in the photo above on the left, I use a denser brush.
It being sheer makes it prone to being easily covered up by a bold blush or toned down too much by my finishing powders, so I have to keep that in mind.

I don’t believe I’ve posted a new bronzer ranking for 2025, but based on my list from 2024, I would possibly rank this above Vieve as a new #13.

Yves Saint Laurent Loveshine Candy Glaze Holiday Collection in 22 Shimmer Rose (Medium Pearlescent Pink).

I like the YSL Candy Glazes, but I made a mistake in assuming the 2025 limited edition shimmer lippie would be the same formula as the shimmer one from 2024, which is actually a Loveshine Lipstick. That 2024 Holiday Loveshine has a wonderful emollient yet balmy consistency, but the shade of pink is quite bold and bright on me. I was too overly excited about this more natural looking color to check which line it was actually from.

The way Shimmer Rose looks in the tube in the leftmost photo is a bit too warm, but my reason for posting it was just to show how much smaller the shimmer particles look compared to Pink Desire.

I found it interesting that Shimmer Rose is even stickier than the permanent Candy Glazes and it still isn’t as natural looking on me because the shade looks even more cool toned compared to my warm undertone. Although it turns more bubble-gum pink than I wanted, I consider Shimmer Rose to be more wearable on me than Pink Desire. Besides the photo below, I’m also wearing it in the photo on the right side in the blush section.

As seen in the arm and lip swatches, there are chunkier pieces that come onto the lips when first applied, but they can be smoothed out nicely and evenly. My other Candy Glazes don’t swatch like this, but rubbing my lips together a few times makes it a non-issue.

I don’t feel any graininess from the shimmer, this has a light fruity scent, and the stickiness extends the time that I have a moisture barrier gripping my lips. Even if I wipe my lips with a wet paper towel, the sticky residue persists, so oil is the easiest way to remove it completely.

I can, and have, used this a few times in the center of my lips to boost the gloss level of other lip products. However, I still don’t use this enough to be able to say this was a good purchase for me. It honestly wasn’t, but at least the packaging is beautiful!

I will do my best to be better informed when this year’s limited edition lip products launch towards the end of the year. Then again, I’m supposed to be on a lip product no-buy, so maybe I should avoid it altogether!

That’s all for today! Bis dann!

-Lili

Lisa Eldridge Liquid Silk Shade Extension (Mimi) and Betty Kitten Pouch

I’m a huge fan of the Liquid Silk product as an eyeshadow primer. It has enough coverage to conceal the discoloration around my eyes, but the shade Phoebe doesn’t alter the colors of the eyeshadows I put on top all that much.
As standalone eyeshadows, they look smoothing and non-drying on the lids. I have enough time to blend out the edges before it fully sets and it mixes well with other shades. It doesn’t crease, doesn’t fade, and stays put very well in my deepest eye wrinkle/crease.

I was so excited to buy Mimi because I figured it would go very well with neutral and green eyeshadows that are my go-to kind of looks lately. However, I did not expect it to look so brownish-grey with a slight tinge of green. The weirdest part though is that my cell phone camera makes the swatch look way more green than it is in person. It was driving me absolutely crazy! The eye swatches were accurate, but every arm swatch looked so green! I can’t explain how my phone could capture the color on the applicator correctly, but not the swatch within the same photo!

After trying to photograph Mimi in different lighting conditions, the two below are the best I could get. The one on the left is closest to how the color looks on my eyes. The one on the right (where I blocked out light from shining on the swatch directly) is closest to how it’s supposed to look on my arm.

How it looks on the eyes is the most important part to show, which is at least accurate.

Even though Mimi looks different than what I expected and wanted, it’s such an unusual shade of brown that I actually like it!

At this point in time, I now have the shades Mimi, Phoebe (my second tube of it), and Gaia. As interesting as I find some of the other colors, I don’t use liquid eyeshadows enough to justify adding more. The only reason I used up Phoebe is because it has been my main primer of choice throughout 2025.

In my initial review, I added an update about the stopper problem and how I started to struggle with reaching the product within 3-6 months of use before I removed the stopper entirely. I was correct in guessing that I had finished half of Phoebe within the first six months, and I used up the remainder in another six months.
I was worried Phoebe would dry out quicker after removing the stopper, so I was careful to not leave the cap off for too long between uses. It was only in the final two months that the product got noticeably drier. So, I will repeat this strategy if the issue reoccurs with my other Liquid Silks. Gaia is my oldest one, but I still haven’t used up that much of it.

As for the Betty Kitten Pouch, it’s just as soft as Lisa Eldridge’s other velvet pouches, and it’s nice to have the taller shape. I couldn’t resist!

The Betty Pouch is free with orders over $125 (or €108), but I purchased it outright for €35.

Anyway, that was my quick review/update! I hope this has been helpful!

-Lili

MAC Metamorphosis Face and Eye Palette

If you’re already familiar with my blog and my interests, you’ll know right away that I wanted this palette for the packaging. I love how the design appears to be a simple, yet pretty, black and white drawing until it is turned at different angles in the light, revealing all the colors of the rainbow.

MAC’s face and cheek products have always been among my favorites in my makeup collection, but I tend to be unimpressed by their eyeshadows. The last palette I tried from MAC was the Lunar Luck Made My Fortune Eyeshadow Palette from 2022. Since then, the brand has reformulated their eyeshadows. I hear they perform better than before, but I was unwilling to take that chance until now.

Technically, the latest single eyeshadow I’ve tried from MAC has been their Jelly Shine Eyeshadow, but it’s a new formula for them. So, I couldn’t use that as a gauge for whether or not I’d enjoy their standard eyeshadows.

Frankly, I can’t consider this palette an example of what MAC’s primary eyeshadow formula is like either because these are so different from anything I’ve previously experienced from them! To start with, these don’t feel like traditional powder eyeshadows. They all have a very slick and smooth feel to the touch that’s prevalent in dimethicone-heavy formulas.
Daft Pink, Lavender Lemonade, and Cherry Sangria in particular are more pliable as if they’re slightly stiffer Colourpop Super Shocks. Lavender Lemonade is the closest to having a Super Shock consistency because it’s the one that’s easy to push and move around.
On the box, it’s written that the ingredients for Cherry Sangria and Daffodillionaire are supposed to be the same, and that Daft Pink, Hot Honey, Lavender Lemonade and Calypso Coral are the same. Considering the fact that I find Daffodillionaire, Hot Honey, and Calypso Coral to be the firmer ones instead, I cannot fathom why the slippery, yet more solidly pressed, eyeshadow is in the same category as the looser goopier one. The photo below shows how messy this gets after just one day.

I have to thank Nikki for pointing out that other than Synthetic Fluorphlogopite, this palette and MAC’s Shadeshift Chrome Eyeshadow formula seem to be the same.

What I found from checking a few ingredient lists on MAC’s website (which tend to be incomplete), is that the formula with the second-most ingredients in common to these are the Jelly Shine eyeshadows with 6 out of 13 shared. However, the Jelly Shine are still much more similar to MAC’s standard shimmer/metallic formula than the ones in the Metamorphosis Palette with around 12 out of 17 in common.

These eyeshadows are pigmented, but they blend out in such a way that I get some translucency and can see my skin underneath. I can build them up to be opaque if I want, but it takes a lot more effort with a brush. This formula is much more suited to finger-application.
Since none of these are matte, I instinctively want to apply them to my eyes with my fingers anyway. The problem is that the smallest petal-shaped pans are more difficult to get into. Plus, the blush type of shades (Hot Honey and Cherry Sangria) can look a bit patchy in the first layers with a brush, so the issue is exacerbated if I try to apply those to my cheeks with my fingers. The Singe Beauty FO-3 and Rephr LC02 are small cheek brushes, but I still have to be careful about accidentally picking up some of the neighboring eyeshadows.

Daffodillionaire is my kind of highlighter shade, so I was pleased to know it suits me on my face and eyes. Even though these are buildable formulas that can be sheered out, I imagine this would be too dark for those with lighter skin and too warm for those with a cool undertone.
On my eyes, it’s just light enough to add brightness. On my face, it draws more attention to texture, but the lack of shimmer makes it still fairly smooth looking for a highlighter.

Hot Honey is easy to see on my eyes, but the color tone doesn’t stand out as vividly on my cheeks. I like this though, because too many orange blushes are bold and unnatural looking on me. That being said, I still prefer a flush of pink, so I either skip using this shade as blush altogether or I mix it with Calypso Coral.

Daft Pink is an iridescent type of pink, along with being more topper-like than the other shades. It takes more effort to build it up on my eyes, and especially as a highlighter on my cheeks. This shade looks quite pretty paired with Calypso Coral, but if I add enough layers to see the color and have the shine from it stand out more than the amount Calypso Coral already has, then I start to notice a slightly frosty white cast on my skin.

Calypso Coral has a sheer quality to it that requires multiple layers, but over-applying this dark color will result in it looking too intense and metallic as well. So, finding that balance every time for blush usage can be a challenge. I have a similar problem with it showing up on my eyes, and though wetting my brush serves to make it easier to deposit the product, it doesn’t do much intensifying. When I accidentally covered some of Calypso Coral with Hot Honey on my eyes, it was very difficult to get that red tone back, as there is a maximum to how many layers can be built on each other. A wet brush helped, but not a lot.

Lavender Lemonade is the other topper-style shade, but it has more pigment than Daft Pink. Because it’s a light purple with blue-purple shimmer, I find it to be the most interesting pan of product in the palette. This and Cherry Sangria are the only ones I’d use exclusively as eyeshadows, and not face products, which is probably why MAC chose to put them in the smaller pans. I could see this being a cool highlighter for someone who likes more adventurous or avant garde type of looks. The official MAC website has some intriguing spring-inspired editorial looks that I might want to recreate when it’s actually spring time, but not right now.

I like Cherry Sangria as a deepening shade for the outer corner in eye looks. It’s easier for me to use my finger with this as an eyeshadow, but when I’ve tried to wear it as eyeliner, it took too many passes over the lash lines with a dry liner brush. So, I go in right away with a damp brush to save time.

Wearing Hot Honey and Calypso Coral on my cheeks makes me think about how I really should start using my MAC Extra Dimension Blushes again. The Extra Dimension ones give more color payoff quicker, and have a similar amount of shine. However, the Metamorphosis shades have a subtler look overall because the consistency is creamier and blends better into my foundation. The reflect isn’t a natural-looking glow, but it looks better blended into my skin.
The Metamorphosis pigment level reminds me a bit of MAC’s discontinued Sheertone Shimmer Blush formula, but those had a more obvious powder look even if the shades themselves were more muted and less opaque.

I get at least six hours of wear time for the Metamorphosis products on my cheeks and eyes before the fading starts. It holds up better on my eyes if I use an eyeshadow primer, but I just accept that my makeup is going to look more muted before the day is over.
Also, at some point in the day, the product will be missing from the inner part of my crease line.

So, this doesn’t have the best longevity. The shades still need to be built up on me. I have to use specific brushes or dig my fingers in the pans, and it’s inevitable that I will dirty the outer rim and the edges that divide the shades. Despite these inconveniences, I’m happy with this product!

Typically, I don’t find spring collections to be appealing because light shades, especially pastels, are difficult for me to pull off. Springs shades also tend to be in cool or neutral tones, similar to the kind of spring looks I did in my Wedding Makeup post. However, there were enough warm shades in the Metamorphosis Palette, and deeper colors, to make me feel like this is actually suited to me. I thought for sure that the face and eye aspect would be a gimmick, but this really is quite versatile. I don’t think it’s going to be great for everyone, but maybe others will appreciate that it’s a little different from what is typically released for spring.

I had an unredeemed birthday discount code from Douglas (in January), so I figured it would be a nice gift to myself. I know for sure that I’m only going to reach for this palette in the winter to spring set of months, but I’ve never regretted getting the first set of Oden’s Eye holiday palettes that I now only really use in the month of December. That’s still more attention than I give plenty of other palettes in my makeup collection!

I hope this review has been helpful! Thank you for reading!

-Lili